Monday, March 28, 2016

What do Czech people think of Bavarians?

 Recently I am studying on Bavaria-Czech relations, and I know that Benes Decrees have soured their relations terribly, and that the ice age was only broken when Seehofer visited Prague in December 2010 without precondition on talking about Benes Decrees. 

But on top of the highly political "fight" going on, I am wondering if there are complaints from the Czechs to the Bavarian side? How is the general dynamic like between two groups of people? Any positive or negative interaction? 

That is because I also read interview from Prime Minister Tillich on both Bavaria and Czech Republic, and how he mentioned that the complaints from Czech Republic was often about Bavaria. I am curious at what kind of dissatisfaction they have for their neighbours. 

I don't think they really differentiate Bavarians from Germans, generally, unless of course they are German students or have a lot of dealings with them.
They see Germans as disciplined, thrifty, clever, hardworking and well-organized. These threads run through the best of Czech society and the educated, white collar class of Czechs tend to exemplify the same positive traits.
I have never heard anyone in the Czech Republic slag off Bavarians and the only negative thing I've ever heard is that Germans are a bit too procedure oriented.
I had a student who married a Bavarian and moved there; she told me that there was a bit of discrimination against her and that everybody thought that all Czechs were 'sluts' but over time she made friends and assimilated. (Note, she was a very high-level German speaker.)

The Beneš decrees seldom come up.
When they do, Czechs tend to react the same way as all or most nationalities react when faced with a dark spot on their past:
  • some deny it;
  • some feel guilty about it;
  • some feel that it should be atoned for
  • some shrug it off and chalk it up to history and one more bad thing that happened in the war
  • some are defensive about it.
Most don't really think about it.
Occasionally a politician will try to win populist points using it, but I'm pretty sure the majority of well-educated Czechs despise that kind of thing.
Ask an American about his country's history with Native Americans; or a Brit about certain actions taken by the British Empire in the colonies; or a Russian about Stalin's programs; and so on... you will get a similar mix of reactions.

Czechs are no different than most nationalities in this respect.
Note: I don't live at the German-Czech border.
Any border problems I would imagine probably stem from the high amount of sexual tourists that have traditionally  come over the border from Germany.
Of course respectable people don't approve of that.
But most Czechs do not have any negative notions about  Germans or Bavarians.

ASOIAF: how is Tyrion so successful in the battles he's in?

Look, let's face it. The idea of Tyrion Lannister as Badass McGee(which is exactly what he is in the books) is incredibly implausible for a normal dwarf(like Peter Dinklage.)
I believe in the books, only Tryion's legs are stunted and twisted; his arms, apparently are strong, which allows him to slay armored, trained knights right and left in the Battle of the Blackwater and hold his won in the Battle of the Greenfork.
Clearly this is an instance where something can be more-or-less believable in a book but would stretch credibility too much in a film or TV show, which is why the show wisely opted for a less bad-ass(though no less brave) Tyrion.

ASOIAF: Is Jon Snow the Prince that Was Promised?


AZOR AHAI: Alternative Theories
Definitely Jon Snow could be Azor Ahai.
And since the publication of A Dance with Dragons, it's been a popular--probably the most popular--candidate for the role for various reasons, for reasons copiously detailed elsewhere.
Particularly significant and less ambiguous than the other pieces of evidence is Melisandre's vision in the flames.
Whether the Prince that was Promised is the same as Azor Ahai/Last Hero is up for debate. But it seems that Melisandre and Aemon think they are the same.
But, obviously the slaves and R'hllor-ites of Essos (not to mention Maester Aemon) think it's Dany and she seems another obvious candidate for it;but fan sentiment has turned against her in general and the arrow of the compass seems to be pointing more towards Jon Snow.
But I'm going to offer three alternative theories that I like, just for fun.  I'm going to assume AAR and TPTWP are indeed the same person.
        1. AZOR AHAI IS NEITHER JON SNOW OR DAENERYS TARGARYen.   In trying to think 'outside the box' on this issue, I hope that the Chosen One is  not the tropey Jon Snow and Daenerys.
I hope it's someone relatively unexpected, like Jaime or Brienne. Or Theon. Or Bran. Or Sam 'The Slayer' Tarly. Or even Stannis. 
You can look at any of their stories, and play around with the symbology of the myth(the Last hero and his Dog; the myth of the making of Lightbringer) and spin theories of your own.
             My personal favorite candidate for this is either Jaime or Brienne, with Oathkeeper being the potential Lightbringer. Mainly because I think it would be quite a character arc for Jaime.
      2. AZOR AHAI DIED ON THE TRIDENT
             Rhaegar really was the Prince that Was Promised. And, whoops! Robert Baratheon killed him before he had a chance to save the world. This one amuses me to no end.
       3. There are two Azor Ahais.
                Two of them. Two opposing prophecies. A Prophecy of Ice. A prophecy of  Fire. A Last Hero who stops the demonic and cold Others. A Last Hero who stands up against the all-destructive fiery force of the Dragons.
              These two figures are destined to clash. (And wouldn't that be awesome?)
(      4. There is no Azor Ahai.
            The Prophecy is a bunch of meaningless drivel; symbolic , metaphorical, meaningless (and for readers, incredibly vague and incomplete) that people interpret anyway they want. Like the Book of Revelations. The Ten Headed Beast is Roman Empire! It's the Catholic Church! It's the European Union! It's the USA! The world banking system! The Internet! The Anti-christ is JFK! It's Hitler! It's Obama!
             Wars are fought, revolutions staged, children are burned at the stake in sacrifice, all with the intent of  chasing the idea of a murky mythological figure who will not appear in any definitive way. Or GRRM will never reveal it and will provide clues that point to several characters that might be a good (but never a perfect) fit.
           Readers would thus be caught up in the same conflict arguing about who Azor Ahai is because no answer is forthcoming. There are only vague hints that require logical leaps and creative guesses on the reader's part.
This last is my favorite 'alternative' theory. Although perhaps it's too...post Song of Ice and Fire, or something.
I think we're going to get more details of what exactly the prophecy entails in the next book. New theories will be spun.

Saturday, March 26, 2016

What is the best strategy to raising a bi-lingual child?

I'm not sure what the 'best' strategy is, but here are our rules:
  • I speak only English to my son. 
  • My girlfriend speaks only Czech to my son.
    • No exceptions. It's actually got to the point where he gets angry if Jana speaks English or I speak Czech. 
  • If I am around my girlfriend and I speak English together.
    • My son therefore feels it's natural to communicate in English with me; and natural to communicate in Czech with my girlfriends.
    • WE also speak English with native-speaking teachers at school. 
  • We watch TV and Youtube mostly in English. We live in the Czech Republic so he's surrounded by Czech at school and with his extended family and friends and so on. I know it sounds bad, but TV actually teaches young kids grammatical structures and idiomatic speech very effectively.
    • Therefore we watch TV and youtube exclusively or almost exclusively in English(unless the whole family is watching something.)
  • My son doesn't read yet. When he learns, I plan to have him read  favorite books in English. It's going to be a chore: Czech is phonetic so it's actually easier to read than English, but I really want him to be able to read.
Beyond that, I don't know. So far he switches very easily between sentences depending on who he's talking to, which is a sight to see!

ASOIAF: Are there any similarities between Lyanna Stark and Sansa Stark?

They were beautiful and sought after, the kind of young beauties that realms are lost and won for.

Arya in general is much more associated with Lyanna's rather Tomboy-like traits.

But there was a whiff of Sansa's naive idealism in Lyanna's rash elopement with Rhaegar--and we know that Rhaegar's songs made Lyanna cry.
That seems pretty Sansa-like.
And on her bed of blood,  she clutched the blackened petals of the roses she'd been given.

So as Arya-like as Lyanna generally was, she seems to have had a Sansa-like romantic streak.

ASOIAF: How Does Bran fulfil the Hero's journey?

Bran's  journey into the Hero's journey mould very well.
Not only Bran's.
Daenerys, Tyrion, Arya, Sansa, Jaime and Theon all go on this path, too(as well as Jon), though I haven't analyzed all of them to determine the exact steps.
The thing about the story not being finished means that we can't be certain REALLY at what point a given hero is in his or her appointed journey.
  • The ordinary world:
    • WE meet Bran among his family, in a world we know to be thousands of years old.
    • His father is kind and wise benevolent Lord of a great land and he has a normal relationship between his siblings. 
    • There is a threat on the horizon of eventual conflict with the Wildlings.
    • Bran is a happy boy yearning for adventure and glory and is safe and uncomfortable, blissfully unaware of the threat to humankind that is developing over the Wall.
      • IN the course of the first chapter, he gains a pet but there is grim foreshadowing of a stag killing a direwolf.
art by Mark evans
  • The Call to Adventure:
    • Bran's world and life is completely changed when Jaime Lannister attempts to kill him by defenestration. He is paralyzed from the waist down and all his former dreams are shattered.
      • IN his coma, he is visited by a Three-Eyed Crow who shows him terrifying things happening in the world and tells him that he has been Chosen since birth and will play a part in the Events to follow.
art by sharksden
  • Refusal of the Call
    • Upon waking Bran refuses to accept his new status as a cripple;
    • He is in denial of his growing magical abilities.
    • His earthly mentor Maester Luwin cautions against a belief in the metaphysical and urges him to accept his mundane reality, which he does.
      • The fact is, he is skinchanging Summer though, with increasing regularity.
  • Meeting with the Mentor
    • Bran has a number of mentors.
      • Ned Stark gives him advice about politics and the Lord's role.
      • Maester Luwin fathers him along in the art of feudal politics and teaches him a reason-based vision of the world
      • Osha, the Wildling,  accepts his magical abilities and encourages his acceptance of them
      • But it's Jojen Reed who is his real mentor along the hero's journey.
      • A boy himself, with his own mysterious insight into the Other Side Jojen  proves the truth of his prophetic greendreams and by doing so, convinces Bran to accept his growing abilities in the mystical realm
art by Hooooon
  • Crossing the First Threshold:
    • To escape Theon's clutches, Bran accepts his powers, fully commits to his role, and  wargs into his direwolf, Summer.
    • He leaves his life behind and sets off on a quest with his companions to find the Three-Eyed Crow of his dreams.
      • He continues to warg into Summer as his powers grow
  • Test, Allies, Enemies:
    • Besides Jojen, Meera, Hodor and Summer, Bran meets other allies on his journey
      • The Liddle who gives him shelter and food, and possibly protects him in other ways
      • Samwell Tarly, who leads him through the Magic Threshold to the Other Side of the Wall
      • Coldhands guides him North to the Cave of the Three-Eyed Crow. He has some distrust of Coldhands, who is obviously undead.
      • Brynden "Bloodraven" Rivers, the Three-Eyed Crow himself
    • Bran's enemies are legion:
      • He is searched for by Boltons
      • he is hunted by a wild wolf-pack
      • he encounters wildlings
    • Tests
      • He uses his magic abilities to rescue Jon Snow from the Wildlings
      • He eats flesh that may be human
      • He goes through a period of learning in which he masters many arts of Greenseeing as he trains under the Last Greenseer
      • He is given a paste of weirwood paste that enhances his powers
      • He wargs into Hodor willy-nilly, demonstrating mastery of his skills
      • He, with Summer demonstrates his primacy and takes leadership of the pack of wolves following him
art by Eva Marie Toker
  • Approach to the Inmost Cave
    • In his final approach, Bran and his companions are attacked by an army of the Undead, but he gains entrance.
  • The Inmost Cave
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
This is where we stand in Bran's story. In fact, we may not be here yet. The 'Inmost Cave' may not be a cave at all. It may be some other destination, the Heart of Winter.
But whether we're still in the Enemies, allies, test phase or the Inmost Cave phase, I'd say we were still around the middle of the story arc. Bran hasn't had an awful lot of chapters, so I think his story will easily wrap up in two books.
DISCLAIMER: the point of no return
From now on, we can only speculate. It's all ifs from here.I don't like predicting too much because I don't want to spoil myself. If you disagree with my predictions, that's cool. I'm not sure I even agree with them and sometimes, my predictions contradict each other. Because I like it better that way. I like examining lots of different ways the story would play out. It's part of the fun.
The Ordeal:
Usually, in the ordeal, the hero must confront his death; or confront his greatest fear. This would be the moment when Luke Skywalker beheads Darth Vader in the Tree-Cave on Dagohbah only to find his own face behind the mask. In epic fantasies, some characters seem to repeat some of these steps over and over again.
What will be Bran's ordeal?
Is it possible that his ordeal has been the long struggle to the Inmost Cave? That the reward was the yummy paste and the pleasurable mastery of his powers? Isn't that what he's been going for?
I'd say no.
art by jbcasacop
I speculate that it will be Jon Snow's death.
Only death can pay for life.
Perhaps Bran will be forced to choose to sacrifice his own life to save Jon's.
But if so,  there will be an intervention.
Maybe it will be Melisandre sacrificing Shireen.
But I think it's more likely that it will be Stannis executing Theon to the Heart Tree. Thus Theon will redeem himself by saving Jon and  getting Bran off the hook.
However it's done,  Bran must survive the ordeal. Unless his Heroe's Journey ends abruptly. I'm not feeling it, though.
.THe Reward(Seizing the Sword)
Things are even more iffy from here on out.
This is where the hero generally accepts the treasure that he has won through the ordeal. This is traditionally the sword. Hmmm...Is Bran Azor Ahai? Just speculating, don't downvote me fanboys & girls. Just because he's a Mary Sue doesn't mean that Jon is not the big one.
Anyway...
What's Bran's quest all about? What's Bran looking for? What has he traipsed all over the North, starving, surviving only on oatmeal cookies, Jojen paste and roast human for?
You will never walk. But you will fly.
--A Game of Thrones
My guess is that Bran WILL warg a Dragon. The dragon will be his REWARD, the Sword he Seizes.
Having seized his sword, the hero usually begins on....
  • The Journey Back
AT this point, the Hero feels that he has won, but he has not. He is confronted with the fact that he must join his personal cause to a higher cause: In this case, joining forces with the other Heroes in the story to defeat the Others and the menace at the Heart of Winter.
  • Resurrection
AT this point, the Hero faces his greatest challenge. If he fails and dies, the world dies with him.
This seems likely to be the final battle with the Others.
THere are so many heroes in this series who fulfill various steps of the Hero's arc. Will they all fight together playing various parts? Or will they fight each other?
Will it be the Others fighting Bran? Or will it be another character? There is one dark passage that smelled like foreshadowing to me.
(And this is my darkest bit of prediction: those you who love using words like 'tinfoil' or 'crackpot' may apply them here.) In fact, just skip this part if you don't like this kind of thing)
It might be  that Bran's final adversary might be Daenerys.
I am not calling it.
I'm not at all certain. But there's one tiny little line that stuck out at me on my third re-read:
Axell Florent's brother had been burned by Melisandre, Maester Aemon had informed him, yet Ser Axell had done little and less to stop it. What sort of man can stand by idly and watch his own brother being burned alive?
--Jon III, A Dance with Dragons
Make of it what you will, but I  got chills when I read that. Could be another Stark though. Like Rickon.
I think that it's going to be one of them, though. While another one watches.
.
  • Final Stage: Return with the Elixir
Assuming Bran survives this final battle, Bran will go back to some sort of normalcy. Human kind will pick up the pieces. The destructive forces that have threatened will have subsided.
But everything will have changed.
Some of his siblings will be gone.
But Jojen Reed said it and I therefore believe it. The wolves will return.
I believe it literally.
The original working title of the last as-yet-not-even-started volume was A Time for Wolves.
I think at the end of the series our surviving  Stark heroes(at a guess, Jon, Arya and Bran, perhaps Rickon)  will be reunited in the bodies of their direwolves.
While Sansa rules the North..
And there's your bittersweet ending.

Thursday, March 24, 2016

Why do so many Americans see Europ as a communist hell-hole?

Well, a great chunk of Americans don't. And I'm pretty sure even a cursory glance around the Internet will prove that to be true.
But the idea that Americans are somehow philosophically squaring off with the social knights of Europe is an attractive one to some people who  see politics as a great football match in which the other team is to be dehumanized, derided, spat upon and, ultimately, pummeled into submission. Go team!

Adults shouldn't think like that, but demogogues and power-mongers have been utilizing the Politics of Division for centuries. And their minions, unwitting all, are all over the Internet doing what they've been trained to do.
Once more into the breach!

Now, this may surprise you, but in fact, not every American thinks about Europe. It's a country of 320 000 000 with a multitude of different back grounds and attitudes--about EVERYTHING.
But if I had to describe the various attitudes of Americans to attitude I'd group them in these categories:
  1. Americans who don't care or think about Europe RARELY IF AT ALL. (Rougly about 60 percent of the populace.)
2. Americans who think Europe is a nice place to visit but....you know, just not for them..(about 20 percent)

3.Americans who think that Europe is a social utopia that has solved every problem ever presented by man where everybody gets up every morning singing in full-throated harmony to greet the sunrise and thank the Gods for their existence .(about 15 percent).

4.Americans who think that Europe is a COMMUNIST HELLHOLE.


What can I say? I'm tempted to say why dwell on any of their attitudes?  Who cares what they think?
But that's because I'm American. And therefore I don't get why anyone would care.
And there you go: because this is  where American and European contexts differ.
Europeans are outward looking.
Doesn't it make sense that Europeans would naturally look out at the world? A good deal of them live pretty close to a border. I think it would be a very rare European who hadn't visited another country where they speak a different language.
I live in the Czech Republic, about fifteen miles away from a foreign country. 23 years ago it was the same country. 100 years ago it was a province of a greater empire. Before that, in the Middle Ages,  it was part of a different empire, the descendant of which ended up taking it over in 1938.

These countries touch each other, in history and today.
I own a company that provides services to Czech factories owned by Germans, by Americans, By French people, Austrian mega-corporations, English companies, and local companies, who buy and sell every single day from someone abroad.
Countries have a common history of wars and blood and trade and bread and friendship. They chafe up against each other, they give each other massages, they lend a hand, they give a sucker-punch.
They affect each other.
They notice the success of another country(in Europe and without) and they think 'hmm, maybe we should do things that way.'
They see where policies seem to have failed abroad and think, 'we are not going to make that mistake.'
Europeans think about Europe and they think about America; they think about Asia or Africa. They notice things.
And they should. Why on earth wouldn't they? That's how they've survived.

Americans are inward-looking.
Your business is your business, my business is my business. You do what you want, I'll do what you want.
WE crossed the ocean in a leaky boat so we could live out in the middle of nowhere and do whatever the hell we wanted and not worry about other people too much.
OK, in reality we were and are way more interconnected than that. But there's a certain mythos. The rugged indivualist, the pioneer, the boot-strapping muck-puller. Tough as nails and able to build a house with his nothing but an axe and some fingernails.
It is a myth and it pretty much always was a myth. But it's a myth that defines Americans.
We don't need the metric system. We have our own phonetic alphabet. Fahrenheit because it's more specific, inches and miles even though the Imperial system is stupid but we don't give a damn, our rugged individualism will take the more complicated system, thank you.
The downside is that we don't look so much at other countries, so we don't understand them. Ignorance is the price we pay for our myth of self-sufficiency.

Americans are dramatic
America has a lot of problems. Oh, some people will tell you we don't but everyone knows we do. And we broadcast those problems 24/7. To ourselves. And to the rest of the World.
Now, I live in Europe. Europe has some problems. But you know what Europe doesn't do? It doesn't broadcast it's problems to the whole world. I mean, the problems have to be pretty big before Americans even notice them, and then it's STILL an American source reporting on them.
But American problems are bigger, and you know what. Deep down, Americans like their problems.
Problems are dramatic. Problems are tragic. WE pit ourselves against the elements and we pit ourselves against each other and we pit each other against the bureaucracy and we go down swinging and then nurse our hurts, content that we've lived up to the hard-fisted pioneer that makes up a corner of our souls.
Americans are dramatic and define things dramatically. That's why  political debate is so extreme. The other guy is either setting up death panels for the sick or he's forcing the poor to die a horrible death in the streets.
Ridiculous.

America was created. Other countries just happened
There's been a lot of talk about American exceptionalism in the last few years. Personally, I never heard the term when I was growing up. It's a new term. A trendy thing. Something that politicians say to get the flag-waver's going; something critics use as evidence of our overweening arrogance.
But I guess a lot of Americans believe in that; believe in the myth that we threw off the yoke of a despotic Europe centuries ago and forged our own hard-going but glorious path. There's a core belief in the 'American experiment' that defines America differently even from other democracies who developed differntly and less abruptly--or more recently.

Now all of the above is reinforced by propaganda. And propaganda in America is a very weird thing. Because it's not so much this:
because this doesn't work in an inward looking country. This is seen as campy and funny. Something nobody would fall for. I see old-school communist propaganda in Europe and it cracks me up! It's so obvious. That stuff would never work in the USA. If, indeed, it ever worked in Europe.

American propaganda looks like this:
This is what Americans are saturated in.

I can't stress enough how much the trivial and the substance-free dreams of materialism bombard Americans at nearly every second of the day.
It's not that one can't see REAL news; it's not like there's a 'Great FireWall of America' that the Government has erected.

It's just drowned out in the din of reality tv, infomercials, soap opera, celebrity news, sitcoms, crime dramas, mega-sports events, game shows, local news about newborn kittens stuck in a tree, and of course, the REAL news of big social problems: riots, protests, police killings, racism, mass shootings, hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, automobile pile ups, the War on Terror, and so on.

So, you see if you take all these elements:
  • ignorance born out of a mind-your-own business mentality which springs from a myth of the Holy Individual
  • a sense of drama and strength-through-hardship outlook
  • a ridiculous non-stop barrage of media images that focus the viewer on every aspect of human reality in the USA and nowhere else
  • And then you add the fact that we have only two countries on our borders and those borders have been stable for a long, long, long time
  • and that, as a country, we really are all-but-self-sufficient--we may import cheap crap from China but we don't have to
  • and finally, a political culture whose polarization, drama and excesses are absolutely out of control
then American ignorance and American misconceptions about Europe and the rest of the world start to make a little more sense.
Hope that helps.

The funny thing is, that, even as Europe is NOT a 'Communist Hell-hole' neither is America the AynRand-ian bastion of free-market capitalism it pretends to be.
Both are mixed economies with welfare programs, free education, retirement funds,  and even medical funds(limited to the old, disabled or ultra-poor in the USA, though).
Governments in Europe and the USA alike support their own corporations both openly and secretly, through grants and stipends, tax breaks and loopholes.
They have more in common than not. Even the corruption has the same smell.

But the politics of inclusion never go over quite as well as the politics of division.
Lance LaSalle

ASOIAF: How did Samwell Tarly rig the election?


He didn't 'rig' it: just manipulated the vote.

 As in all things political, the election of the 998th Lord Commander of the Night's Watch was a complex affair.
On the one hand you had Ser Denys Mallister of the Shadow Tower.
Ser Denys came from an old family, with a rich and varied tradition of honor and chivalry. He was a competent knight andhe had the right connections. He knew how to talk in the language of the High Lords of Westeros; he understood  the need to be politic in the drive for more men. He wrote well and fluently. He had a magnificant flowing beard that people envied and he went to Eton. He thought he was the right man for the job. And he probably was.

On the other hand, you had Cotter Pyke, an Ironborn bastard and the head of Eastguard.
A hard-ass foul-mouthed illiterate, Pyke was nevertheless tough enough and had the sufficient oomph to make a fine lord commander. He could kill wildlings with one hand while reeling in a swordfish with his other hand. He could hold his breath for two hours straight underwater. He had the following of a lot of men and he thought he was the right man for the job. And he probably was.
They both, Ser Denis and Cotter, held close to a plurality of votes--I mean, to be honest that was kind of rigged in and of itself, because they themselves were able to vote for their own garrisons-- but the problem was they needed a supermajority of 66.6 percent to win.
There were other candidates, but they didn't have a prayer of winning.

Meanwhile there was a the new guy. He'd made his name in the capital of Westeros where he was famous for bribery and corruption. He rose high in office, even though he was a venal rude and course man. He used the wrong fork at dinner. He picked his nose in public. He farted loudly--and I mean constantly. But the thing was, a lot of the normal Night's Watchmen, being humble thieves and rapists and the like thought he was one of them. And they supported him.  That man was Janos Slynt.
Sam was scared because, as the other nobodies were dropping out of the race, inevitably their votes were being given to Slynt. And Slynt scared him. He was going to kill Sam's buddy Jon. Just because he's mean.
 And he was in league with Ser Alliser Thorne, who had had it in for Sam from the beginning. And Sam and his friends, who, frankly were smarter than the rest of the Watch knew that Janos Slynt was exactly the man the Watch did NOT need.
Maester Aemon
felt the same way. No matter what, Janos Slynt should not be in charge. But Maester Aem on respected the democratic principles of the Night's Watch and had sworn an oath not to play politics anyway. So he hinted to Sam to take matters into his own hands.
There was another man affecting all this: Stannis Baratheon, First of His Name, King of the Andals, The Rhoynar and the First Men.
He was impatient. He wanted to get stuff done. He had asses to kick and names to take.
He hated Janos Slynt but really just wanted people to choose already so he could bully his way into a few castles.

So Sam went to Ser Denis Mallister and Cotter Pyke, to try to get them to throw their support behind the other. But, while both of them agreed that Janos Slynt would be a terrible Lord Commander, they really, really didn't like each other. You see, the Ironborn and the Mallisters of Seagard have been fighting each other for hundreds--no thousandsof years. And there was just no way that they were going to support the other. It was unthinkable.
SO SAM LIED. He told Denis Mallister that time was up: Stannis was going to use his kingly authority, and his army to back him up, to make Cotter Pyke Lord Commander.
And he told Cotter Pyke that Stannis was going to make Denis Mallister Lord Commander.
They both tore out their beards and screamed 'This cannot be borne!!'
And so Sam told them to back someone who wasn't even running, but who was qualified, if a little young.
And that man was our hero, Jon Snow.

And so it was done.
The raven wasn't Sam's doing though. Oh, sure, Sam had trained some ravens to say 'Snow' for the heck of it. But not this raven. This raven had belonged to the old Lord Commander, the Old Bear.
And this bird said more than just 'Snow.' He said' Jon Snow!' No one knew how he had got into the voting kettle. Sam didn't know. Three Finger Hobb didn't know. It was a goddamn miracle.
And so Jon was elected.
thanks for the A2A.

Is Game of Thrones post apocalyptic?


https://youtu.be/aTUbAK1DsOc
It's an interestin idea but it's going down the wrong track.

King's Landing, with it's mega-sept, it's Dragonvault and the Red Keep itself are great examples of engineering, all of them less than three hundred years old. I'm sure there are plenty of other castles, too. Winterfell is impressive mainly because of the hot water pipes; , well, Bandon the Builder was a heckuva builder, that's all.
The Titan of Braavos is another incredible feat of non-magical engineering and craft built in the (relatively recent past).
Storm's End? It's built strong to weather storms. It's got some magical protection because of magic.
And as far as Casterly Rock goes, I've seen tons of castles built in mountains. They look awesome! But it's not that impressive and doesn't need post-medieval engineering to do..
The Wall, however,  is explained ONLY by magic. There is no scientific explanation because it's just not possible. For somthing impossible, you don't really need hi-tech engineering. You need magic.
And anyway, the Wall has been build up by the Night's Watch themselves over thousands of years.
The ancient civilization being technologically advanced is a popular trope in fantasy: The Book of the New Sun, The Book of Swords and even, Shannara, if memory serves, focus on that.
But I don't see a lot of evidence for it in A Song of Ice and Fire. In fact, it seems that technology has advanced quite a bit--they went from Stone Age, to Bronze and now they seem to be in the early renaissance, especially in Essos.
If Westeros is comparatively backward relative to Essos, well, so was Britain in the 15th century compared to Italy.
Anyway, I imagine most of the castles were actually just made of wood and then as time went by have been built into stone.
TL;DR: It's fantasy. There's no need to try to make it science fiction: it would, in fact, depend on very bad science.