Tuesday, August 30, 2016

What is Springfield Missouri like?


I partially grew up there and, recognizing that mileages may vary and not everyone’s experience will echo mine, let me tell you: Springfield MO is one of my least favorite towns that I have ever lived in.

The problems are many.
  • While there are some nice residential areas, particularly around the university(MSU), the rest of it is either McMansions, bungalow style housing or older houses.

    Which could, in theory be nice, except Springfield has willfully turned it’s back on the entire northern third of town. That is where I grew up.

    It was the poorer side of town even then, but nowadays it is really bad and clearly has seen better days. Some of the houses on the North Side are kept up but the others are decrepit sad hulks with weedy gardens, ancient buckling sidewalks…there is no doubt that the richer south, who probably supplies most of the politicians have absolutely abandoned the northern third.

    Though, to their credit, they have made an effort to rehabilitate the old center with it’s square. When I was growing up it was practically a collection of shells with windows. Nowadys, there is a pretty vibrant night life, but I have to stress it is mostly for college kids, when it comes to bars. The center is not that interesting but it’s better than it was when I was a kid.
Being a college kid there would probably be fun, actually. There are a good amount of bars and the area around the college is nice.
  • When it comes to the business zones, each corner on one of the more trafficked thoroughfares is practically indistinguishable from the next. It is a town of endlessstrip malls and blocky office buildings. They go for MILES AND MILES AND MILES. Dollar stores and fast food joints sprout from every corner like neon-lit fungi.

    Worse are the loan agencies. I’ve never seen a town with so many offices offering cheap loans. That ought to give you an idea of the how fucked up and ultimately mean spirited and ugly the soul of Springfield is.
  • It is chock full of churches. There are churches everywhere there. Until recently every church had it’s sign out front, usually with a highly negative “fire and brimstone” message on it: Like: If you don’t believe you will burn! That kind of thing. Thankfully, that kind of message has faded a bit in the last decade or so but it was a big thing that really struck me on a visit there in 2000.

    But the people are very much a church-going folk. The Assembly of God has it’s headquarters there — it’s literally the goddamn Vatican of the Assembly of God church. They are the ones that speak in tongues and roll around on the floor babbling insanely during their service. My little brother got beaten up by a cop for calling them hypocrites one Sunday noon, and the cop told my brother: “"Who is the judge going to believe, me or you?”" when my brother protested.
  • Springfield is one of the few towns I’ve ever been afraid to walk around in at night. Oh, there is no gang warfare or even significant minority population (the blacks all fled the place after a flurry of lynchings in the 1930s); forgive the allusion to sterotype: My point is it is pretty common in a racist society like the USA to blame high rates of violent crime on minorities, especially blacks/African Americans. Springfield proves the sterotype to be bullshit, actually) The actual murder rate is twice the national average there! Correction(Originally, I thought it was probably at about the average, but I was told I was 'giving Springfield too much credit.' And I looked at the statistics and was surprised to learn that it was much higher than average.)

     No, the violence comes from either farm boys from outlying villages that come to the ‘'Big City’'’ to “beat up fags”, or from weird white trash meth types who are secret homosexuals and want to beat you up for it. Nowadays the North Side might be more danger
  • As I mentioned, there is no real racial diversity there, which one can miss coming from a bigger city. Springfield misses so much for that.

     There are a few black people descended from the few brave enough to stay in the face of the ferocious racism of the early twentieth century, all pretty much concentrated in one smallish section in the north-center of the city; and there are a fair amount of Vietnamese who came or are descended from refugees that came to Fort Whatever in Arkansas during the War.

    They have all pretty much opened Asian/Thai/Chinese restaurants — so if you like Asian takeaway, it is truly a paradise.
  • In fact, there are a lot of good restaurants in general in Springfield. Far more good restaurants per capita than most Midwestern towns. This is a bit curious. A friend of mine once told me that his theory was that there just was nothing else to do there but go out to eat. Of course, all of the restaurants cater to the mild palette of the average Midwesterner: nothing too spicy or exotic. Still, you can find some good stuff. And what else are you going to do?
  • WalMart absolutely rules the town. They ought to rename it Walmart, Missouri. Not only are Super Walmarts ubiquitous, there is one that literally was an entire damn mall when I was growing up. Now it’s like a HUGE GARGANTUAN Wal-Mart.

    I like going there just so my jaw drops at the ridiculous bigness of it all. There were even Wal-Mart grocery stores, slowly squeezing the life out of other grocery stores. they are all chains themselves anyway, but a variety of chains is still better than a monopoly.

    Still there are a a lot of Mom and Pop establishments there, as well. I reckon a small business owner can do all right there.
  • The library sort of illustrates everything I hate about Springfield. It was recently moved from the old centre(southsiders are afraid to visit the North side of town, absolutely irrationally terrifed. They built a new very, very nice building on the Southernmost part of town with no bus access so no undesirables can visit. (Correction: while this was true when it was first opened(I read a news story about it in the Springfield News-Leader) apparently this has been corrected and the library is accessible by bus.)

    They must have put millions of dollars into this beautiful building. The funny thing is, you go in this place and there are no more books than the old main library had when I was a kid. Why not, you know, buy some books with those millions? They try so hard to be a CITY by making this big modern library but they don't give enough of a shit REALLY to buy any goddamn books. I'm sure the librarians would have it different: make no mistake it's the politicians who make these decisions. 
  • The bus system. Oh my god. I mean, it is mostly used by the homeless and the disabled, so I guess I am glad there is something but it is next to worthless. It can take hours to get to your destination and you WILL have to change buses. Heck, you might as well walk most of the time. Bottom line is, don’t live there without a car. You will not survive a season.
  • The summers are pretty hot and humid. Mosquitoes abound. Bugs in general thrive in the hot almost-jungle-like climate.
  • I will say, while most of the people there are frighteningly conservative(some have even told me they wish to see slavery reinstituted) the people who are a little more intelligent and different do exhibit a wry sense of ironic humor that is probably lost on your average Ozarker. But most of them end up getting out.
  • They also have some big fishing supply shop for outdoorsmen. If you like shopping for fishing poles and camping gear(and I actually do enjoy camping) Bass-Pro is heaven on earth. Sprinfieldians are very proud of it.
  • People are so bored there that high school sports are totally revered. Seriously, the newspaper is FULL of reports of high school football games, not only in Springfield but in every village within a one hundred mile radius. I think that is something you don’t see in larger towns.
  • AS far as culture; yes, there is a symphony; there is a theatre. But let’s not kid ourselves. It IS provincial. But it would be false to say that there wasn’t there. I suppose there are a fair number of decent bar bands there, as well—music is something that America in general is good at. But if you want real country music, you really have to go to Branson which is an hour or so away.
  • Outside of town there are quite picturesque highlands of the Ozarks. And Arkansas is not too far away and the highlands there —I refuse to say mountains— are really beautiful.
  • There is nothing that Springfield doesn’t have (except for an Apple Store—the nearest ones are Oklahoma City, Kansas City or St.Louis) and if you have a good salary and a good job, love Jesus and are your typical conservative American, I daresay that it’s highly livable—not much different from living in suburbia anywhere, I reckon.
  • If you are poor or ‘'’geo-sensitive”, naturally different, or liberal, it is a crushing, brutally sad town. My life instantly improved when I left at 18. Instantly! Everytime I return I enjoy seeing my family but I don’t think I could ever live there. I am getting depressed just thinking about it.
Addendum: Of course I've glossed over some of the good things in Springfield: the parks for example are pretty great. And apparently there are bike trails that one can follow that have been built in the last decade or so. 

 And Fall is a lovely time of year, as is Spring. I was also accused of writing 'flat-out lies' in this blog entry. That is not at all true, though there were two inaccuracies--which I've since corrected.


Written August 30; corrected August 31st

ASOIAF/GOT: Who is Jaqen H'ghar?

ASOIAF/GOT: Who has had the worst death in the series?

Thursday, August 25, 2016

The dirtiest toilet I've ever seen -- a reflection


It was in Italy.
First of all, many of the toilets in Italy are what I believe are termed ‘'Turkish-style”, meaning that they are little more than holes in the floor where one sqats to, ahem, do one’s business.
Some of the Turkish style toilets that I saw were quite clean, but not all of them. 

Anyway, I have to admit that I am not a fan of the Turkish style toilet at all. Perhaps if I had grown up using them, they would be perfectly fine; but it’s hard not to worry about the hygenic factor when faced with an unfamiliar toilet.
ON my way North,, from our holiday in Italy, not too far from the Austrian/Italian border,where we stayed in a village near Lago di Garda and had a wonderful time, I stopped at a filling station to fill the tank of our car and to, uh...empty...the other tank.

There was a line leading out of the foul-smelling building in which the toilets were housed. I patiently waited. I saw people leaving the toilets with looks of disgust on their face. I put it down to the smell, which was unusually rank,  but mentally prepared myself for the possiblity that the toilet would be a little dirty. (It wouldn’t have been the first dirty toilet I had seen in Italy.)
But nothing prepared me for what was there. Not a lifetime of hardship and toil. Not an impoverished childhoold or a roach-infested childhood home; not a decade of school lunches.
YOu see, the Turkish style toilet’s drain was, apparently, clogged. And there was a MOUNTAIN. A MOUNTAIN of…shit. Piled high. Nearly a meter high. Maybe higher, I don't now. It's not like a measured it.

Like a child’s painstakingly-crafted clay model of a volcano. A lovely shade of reddish brown, gleaming under the warm yellow lights.
Rivulets of watery shit were running across the floor. You had no choice but to walk  on this disgusting surface. Through the soles of my shoes, as  I gingerly tread upon the surface, I could feel the grainy texture of it all.
Squatting over the clogged drain was not really a possibility. At least for me. Perhaps an exceedingly tall man could have managed it, if he spread his legs really wide.
So, you kind of had to, you know, stand in front and squat and, you know, drop your… boulders... on the side of this…mountain.
And pray that your actions didn’t start an avalanche.
Now, normally I would have walked out and just gone at the next opportunity. But I really, really had to go. You know how it is when you are on the road.
When I came out, my girlfriend, seeing the shock and horror on my face, asked me what was wrong. I told her I didn’t want to talk about it.
It was two years before the trauma had sufficiently faded to the point where I could talk about this.
Otherwise, it was a lovely holiday. WE went back two years later to Lago di Garda, but the magic had gone.

Wednesday, August 24, 2016

ASOIAF: Why is Daenerys so arrogant?


Feel free to disagree, but Daenerys I think has become so stuck up and entitled and greedy and obsessed with herself. In season 1 she was meek but in season 2 after losing Drogo her arrogance and greediness shot through the roof. She is downright a popinjay. Period. In season 3 she was even worse.

I really feel her arrogance is overstated. And why should she have remained the ‘'meek fuck puppet” of the first book, anyway? On one level she is a woman — if you can call a fifteen year old a woman — who was dealt a deck and made the best of it.
I will never understand why people are so eager to stuff these major characters in the villain box in a series that prides itself on not taking sides. Is it so that, when Daenerys inevitably destroys a bunch of shit they can say “I told you so?” Is it that a half-century’s worth of ‘hero’ stories stuffed down our throats by Hollywood means that people can no longer differentiate tragedy from mere heroic drama? Or maybe it’s just overcompensation for the show and it’s watchers’ near - deification of Dany. Or perhaps it has something to do with Emilia Clarke’s performance.
Daenerys is flawed is what she is. As far as her ‘arrogance’ and ‘entitlement’ goes she is certainly no worse than the other kings and queens in this book. And she has been through worse than quite a lot of them.
Her feeling that she has a right to Westeros is no different, really, than Tyrion feeling he has the legal right to Casterly Rock; or that Ned feeling he had the legal right to Winterfell after Brandon died. It’s no different that Robert Baratheon feeling like he had the right to usurp the throne when, in his minds, the unwritten contract between King and subject was violated by Rhaegar and Aerys; and then taking the crown. No different from Stannis feeling that he has the right despite the fact that a bastard is sitting on the throne.
Dany at no time has ever felt that she had the right to sweep in and that the throne would be just given to her. That’s utter nonsense. It’s not at all supported by the text. That would be arrogant.
On the contrary, since as early as the first book, she’s known that she had to TAKE it by force. In fact, she spends the better part of TWO books trying to gather an army that would allow her to do just that.
And Dany, although, no, she doesn’t always display the best judgement and she is certainlyNOT a great political thinker (Was Robert? Is Stannis? Really? Joffrey? Renly? Cersei? really? They are all totally flawed), does have some qualities that do recommend her:
  • she’s got otherworldly charisma
  • she’s got exceptional courage
  • she acts outside the box.
Now, she is backed up with dragons and that does separate her from the others: she is much, much more dangerous than Stannis, say, and she is NOT afraid to use her incredible powers of destruction(reliant on the dragons, mind) to, well, destroy.
Without the dragons she is little more than a young girl in over her head.This point is made continually.
And I’m like, “No shit.”
And also ‘'So what?”
As to when she metamorphosed from meek sex slave to “arrogant” Dragon Queen(would people really rather she’d just accepted her place as Drogo’s fuck-puppet?) it was a process that has actually gone back and forth.
  1. The first step was on the way to the Dothraki sea, after having a dream about becoming a dragon. After that she took charge of Khal Drogo and became more than just his sex slave. She became his equal, almost.

    She callused up outside and inside.
  2. When she gained the dragons she gained a purpose. Again after a weird, prophetic dragon dream. She emerged from a fire unscathed with dragons under a brand new red comet. I mean, come on. Who isn’t going to interpret that as some weird destiny? Seriously. You think you go through something like that and are just like: OK, now it’s time for me to be meek and go to Vaes Dothrak and live with the rest of the Dosh Khaleen. Poor, poor Drogo.
  3. When her stint as the Beggar Queen in Qarth failed and she promised herself that she was no longer going to beg for help and was just going to take it(which she did at Jorah Mormont’s strong urgings.)
  4. Then she backpedaled and seemed to try to sweep her power under the rug in Meereen, and become a ‘'good ruler” with less than stellar results, after realizing that she had made a huge mess in Astapor. (Which she did: so what was she supposed to do after th emess is already made? Give up and head for Vaes Dothrak to do needlepoint for the rest of her days? Like a ‘'’meek woman” should?
  5. The end of A Dance with Dragons shows her committing once again to Fire and Blood philosophy that, really, has been the only thing that worked for her.
In short, she is no more entitled or arrogant than any other leader, with the exception of Jon Snow(who was elected and earned his position) and maybe Davos —and, from the end of A Storm of Swords on, I would say Stannis is increasingly trying to earn his crown, too.
But that doesn’t amount to a hill of beans. The idea that a king deserves a crown in the ridiculously disfunctional political system of Westeros is, to some extent, ludicrous.
Again, she’s no more entitled than anyone else: she is just more dangerous.
Now, that doesn’t mean that Daenerys is NOT going to fuck shit up when she gets to Westeros. Fucking shit up is what Dany does.

ASOIAF: Why has Jon Snow garnered so much more support in comparison with the more controversial Daenerys?

Saturday, August 13, 2016

ASOIAF: Why does Ygritte feel personally betrayed Jon Snow and consequently become hostile?


New to women, are you? :-D

Over time, Jon's sojourn with the Wildlings was a real revelation to him. He realized that they weren't the monolithic barbarian culture that he'd seen them as all his life.He came to understand that there were good Wildlings and bad ones, honorable Wildlings and scumbags, noble Wildlings and criminals.He understood that they loved and lived, had passions and fears and stories and histories.
He respected that.
He also fell in love with Ygritte, the woman he had spared from beheading.
Ygritte saw Jon slowly become — or almost become — one of them. She understood what was going on with him. And she also took pride in turning him. It was her — crooked-toothed, red-headed Ygritte — her love-making, her humor, her ego that changed a crow, the son of some Great Southron Lord, into one of the Free Folk.
She loved his shyness and his earnestness and she respected his hardihood and his fighter.
Then he refused to kill the man. And fled. Killed another Wildling. And she understood.
Jon lied to her. Jon was lying to her from the beginning. Not only in words, but in action. He became one of them. Not just to survive. But to learn their secrets and report to his superiors.
When he rejected the Wildling culture, he rejected her.
(And it was a conscious, planned rejection, too. He knew he'd have to do it someday and when the time came, he did it.)
Ygritte realized it was never her. It was always them. The crows.
Her "love conquers all" narrative clashed with his "doomed love" narrative, which was was what was playing in his head. The clash of these two different love stories pretty much fueled the whole relationship and kept them going at it in the sleeping bags night and day.
And her love story ended up getting completely shattered: it was a sham all along. So to her, he’d had her. He’d used her.
Jon Snow's narrative was the ultimate winner. He alone had the keys to the information that made her narrative impossible.
He learned from her. And he dumped her. And he had been planning to do it all along.
And then he rides off North to Castle Black, to betray their whole mission and doom it and them, including her, to death at the hands of the Black Crows.
So she shot him.

ASOIAF/Game of Thrones: Is Catelyn Stark still alive in the books?

Catelyn Stark died at the Red Wedding. She shredded her own face with her nails and then someone put her out of her misery by slitting her throat.
Her body was dumped unceremoniously into the Green Fork in a mockery of Tully family burial customs, which places the body in a boat on the Trident which is then set on fire.
Three days later Nymeria (Arya's wolf) glimpsed her bloated, pale corpse floating in the water, swam out and retrieved the corpse, drawing her back to the riverbank.
art by Pinselohr
At the point, the Brother's Without Banners, who were pursuing Sandor Clegane, came across the pair and Nymeria split.
Beric Dondarrion resurrected the corpse by kissing it. He died doing so.
The resurrected corpse of Catelyn Stark is known by many names: The Silent Sister(so called because the wound at her throat prevents her from speaking above a whispery rasp); Mother Mercy; and Lady Stoneheart. She now leads the Brother's Without Banners in a neverending quest for vengeance on the perpetrators of the Red Wedding, especially the Freys. She is not the same character per se as Catelyn Stark. Her personality, damaged by three days of death, seems to have one central purpose: revenge. Much of what humanized Catelyn is gone. She has no mercy and no leeway.
The Brothers Without Banners which follow her have been diminished morally: their focus is no longer as a"Merry Men" type organization stealing from the rich and giving to the poor; they are now more like the gang of a Frey-murderers. They still do support the Smallfolk, though. But they are darker and with less heart than under Beric Dondarrion's rule.
Is Lady Stoneheart the same character as Catelyn Stark, the mother who forewent her urges for vengeance and pushed for peace with the Lannisters and retreat back to the North? The political thinker who almost forged a deal with Renly Baratheon?
For me, no. Lady Stoneheart was Catelyn Stark. But her three days of death have changed her so much—simplified her, purified her—that I see her as a different character.
I liked the flawed Catelyn Stark.
Stoneheart's a hang-happy bitch.

Monday, August 8, 2016

ASOIAF/GOT: Why is Daario Naharis so different in the TV series?

In the books, he has a beard dyed blue and hair of the same color. He also boasts a golden tooth and he is fond of fancy clothes. On the show, he is a typical sellsword, just a little more handsome. Did they change his looks because they felt he was too much of a clown to be a protagonist's love interest?

In the books he's more like Johnny Depp in pirates of the Carribbean. Outrageous and ridiculous but still sexy. Johnny Depp can pull that off, especially in a silly comedy that's pure fun. Johnny Depp calibre actors tend to be really expensive though.
And stylistically, the show in general has eschewed the colors and pagentry of the books. Everything is faded to a dull sombreness, which is logical given that much of it is filmed in a sodden, wet country(Northern Ireland). IN general Book Daario Naharis represents an edge and the show likes to blunt the edges of the story—it didn't quite have the budget to go all the way with it look-wise—you have to go all the way for it to work—so they opted for a cheaper, greyer, muddier palette instead: still a stylistically strong choice that they have been consistent with. Given the duller, greyer context, a blue-haired pirate type with a gold tooth who managed to pull off sexy would feel all wrong.
Still, I think the first Daario, Ed Skrein, managed to bring a certain annoying arrogance to the role which matches Daario. The new Daario is a handsome, sexy man, to be sure, but he ultimately doesn't have the almost otherworldly assholishness that Ed Skrein brought. Pity. Sparks were real.

ASOIAF: Did Ned Stark and Ser Arthur Dayne have a mutual respect


Ned certainly did. EVERYBODY had respect for Ser Arthur Dayne, the Sword of the Morning. He's legendary. He's the Muhammed Ali of Westerosi knights. His exploits are legendary.
This is the man who idly fought off the Smiling Knight for hours, let him get another sword and when he pissed him off, immediately took him down. A man who treated the smallfolk and lesser lords with respect and dignity and wisdom that Aerys should have shown.
He's like a superhero.
He was not only the badass of badass when he was wielding Dawn; but he was also your quintessential noble knight.
Arthur Dayne might have had less respect for Ned--Ned was young and not nearly as famous as Dayne. He also would have regarded him as a traitor and an outlaw; if he was willing to fight for the death to protect Lyanna's unborn son, he must have feared that Ned was capable of killing a newborn Targaryen Prince.
Yet he must have at least had some respect for Ned as a general who had won some notable battles in the Rebellion.

Saturday, August 6, 2016

Americans, Czechs and Food

I wonder if there is any symbol of the difference between the average European and the  average American more obvious or visible than fitness. This is by no means a new observation: everyone knows that Europeans are fitter than Americans. The obesity levels in the USA have reached epidemic levels and obesity and obesity-related diseases have become the leading cause of death. You could probably fill a small bookstore with the volumes written about this phenomenon. And any European you ask will tell you that Americans are fat. 
Above: my typical face after eating.

When I was young, I was sold a vision of a near utopian future of the Jetsons and Star Trek, a world where we would jet off to our jobs in oblong flying cars, a world where food could be conjured in seconds by a simulator; where the menial tasks of day-to-day existence were performed by robots, where phones had been replaced by screen-to-screen communication, and astronauts communicated to people on a given planet with small hand-held communicators and walked around with glassy gleaming computers to analyze their surroundings--and it all happened in a  a world where everyone was fit and trim and ready to get  down and dirty in wrestling matches with hairy monsters -- or fair alien maidens -- from outer space.

Above: a typical man from the future

People may have foreseen the Internet and it's instant face-to-face communications; they could have predicted a smoke-free world of smart-phones and micro-computers. But no one really called it-- that the cold gleaming future of 21st century America would be populated with a host of  human beings suffering from obesity and all it's attendant ailments. 

It's sad.

Of course the societal pressures and lifestyle quirks that make Americans fat exist in Europe, too, and we Europeans are assured that the epidemic is real here, as well. But there's no doubt that, when it comes to obesity, heart disease, diabetes, hemorrhoids, chronic indigestion, heart failure and kidney failure, constipation, kidney stones and back pain and all the other related ailments of the modern, fatter age, America is advanced.

 From the moment I set foot in New York City my thoughts were turned to food as they seldom are in Europe. In the filthy, but energetic and alive,  Sugar Hill neighborhood we stayed in in Harlem, there were pizza joints and an Ethiopian restaurant and a good old-fashioned 90s-style coffee shop complete with young pretty waitresses with beads in their hair and rings in their noses, charmingly tattooed throwbacks to some Lollapalooza orgy my 24-year self might have...observed with curiosity,  if not exactly taken part in. 

Above: a typical nineties alterna-chick
All over New York the choices of food abounded. Hallal stands, burnt chicken breast on a stick, donut shops, a palatial McDonald's on Times Square, enormo-slices of genuine New York Pizza for two bucks a slice, down-town lunch bistros where you could get a sandwich, soup or salad for lunch...
Above:  a typical American meal.
Even the small grocery store across the street from the grimy apartment me stayed in was filled with a plethora of delights -- whatever was missing from my weekly supermarket sojourns in Central Europe  (cheap, quality pate, say, or delicious Central European apples and pears--American apples and pears tasted relatively woody and flavorless -- or greater variety in fresh-baked goods) was replaced by armies of breakfast cereals marching down the aisle and a plethora of crackers, chips, dips and other assorted snack foods, the variety of which can simply not be found in Czech-land and probably not in the whole of Europe. 

With such a enormity of selection to choose from and so much of it yummy junk food, is it any wonder the Americans have come out on top in the race towards the fatter end of the scale?

My vacation wasn't limited to New York and in some ways the stark difference there was magnified(as so many things are) in the toothy, bright, scrubbed clean interior of the North American continent. 

Somewhere buried in a Springsteen song is a lyric extolling the fast food restaurant on the lonely open road. Or maybe not.
Above: a typical American rock star.

 Driving down the American road is a hungry undertaking. And try though you might to prepare against it's myriad temptations with turkey-and-tomato sandwiches on wheat, fresh fruit and snack food for the kids(and you, inevitably), at every exit the allure of greasy, fried fast food beckons, as public signs announce the onset of a battallions of drive-thru business ready to take your order: Qdobas, Starbucks, McDonald's, Burger Kings, Subways, Quiznos, Taco Huts and Taco Bells, Pizza Inns and Pizza Huts, Arby's and Five Guys and Chipotles, Shoneys and IHOPs and Village Inns and Waffle Houses...

It takes a will of iron to resist. Being "on the road" no longer has the societal implications it did in Steinbeck's Grapes of Wrath or even Kerouac's On the Road. It's been a long time since Americans were forced off our land of our ancestors due to bank foreclosures and looming starvation; since we hurtled West into a brighter future of orange trees, silicon and Hollywood; and, other than a brief glorious gasp of youth, perhaps, we are are no longer drunk on the moon, pissing off the side of pick-ups  in the wild Nebraska night on a quest for youthful adventure, alcohol and sex...When we travel now, what we are doing is going on vacation, an exercise that's supposed to be enjoyable, fun for the whole family. On vacation implies a splurge of money so why not spend more? These roadside temptation of burger and burrito and pizza by the slice inevitably find their way to make you do your bidding.

And when you realize that maybe you're spending too much time at the fast food restaurant on the road there is that other symbol of the American far-flung freedom of the road: the ubiquitous gas station. Which in today's modern America, is a fast food restaurant that sells gasoline.

Above: a typical gas station on the American road.

 These places are so weird. Each one seems more sterile and devoid of character than the next, but not in the harsh, communist functional type of way the architecture of Communist Europe suggests. Rather, in a way that they seem as if they've been designed by a committee whose express purpose was to locate any trace of uniqueness, soul or humanity and scrub it off leaving something clean yet so hollow, so plastic--but in the most pleasant, air-conditioned way imaginable. 

These places boast free wi-fi and sell more than just microwaveable junk food. I saw pots of steaming soup, full baked pizzas, sausages sizzling under the heat lamps, constantly in rotation. And of course, that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the pleasures on offer: a smorgasbord of travel necessities for the unprepared and disorganized vacationer: canned foods, chips, sweets. DVDs for the howling, dissatisfied children. Headphones, USB cords, USB sticks, mini-MP3 players; trousers, shorts, sunglasses, hats, t-shirts. Car parts, jumper cables,  spare tyres, auto batteries. And, secreted in the men's toilets discreet vending machines for condoms or sex toys to tittilate HER, that never-changing hard-to-please American anima, that hot nagging mama that every red-blooded animus, every American papa strives to placate. 

But it's all so gloriously delicious

Here is the dirty little secret, the secret the USA keeps from the world, the secret that, when told, makes the Italians and the French and the other Old World snobs howl in frustration and pent-up, impotent rage. 

It's all pretty GOOD. 

America does not have a monopoly on fast food or junk food. You can find cheap food that's basically crap — yet delicious— in any good-sized small town in Europe. But America does it better than anybody else! The USA has got the junk food/fast food thing on LOCKDOWN. It dominates the universe of the fast food meal like America's navy dominates the waters of the world, like Hollywood dominates  cinema, like American music dominates the airwaves.   Nowhere in Europe can any place hope to compete with the Land of the Free Refill--although, really no one bothers trying. In a big city in America, whether it's burgers-and-fries, gyros sandwiches, halal food, Mexican delights, Asian fusion….you can get it. Whenever you want. Thousand calorie bagels compete with thousand calorie Big Macs compete with thousand calorie Filafel Wraps compete with thousand calorie Chicken-fried Meat-stuffed, Cheese-oozy Burrito Dip Supreme Sauce Commando Meals--with a whole apple submerged in chocolate sugar glaze as an extra healthy treat for the kids.

Meanwhile, in my hometown in Europe, population about 30 000,  I can get  
  • chicken schnitzel and French fries.
    Above: a typical Czech fast food meal.
  • Not bad but certainly without the grease splattering richness of whatever the American counterpart would have.
  • A large gyros wrap with gyros meat, cucumbers, tomatoes, and spicy sauce and cheese. Delicious, actually. Especially at three o'clock in the morning after having downed a liter of vodka sodas, when it's literally all you can get.
  • and a weird thing called a "hamburger" which resembles a strange fried slab of inch-thick ham drenched in mayonnaise and thrown onto a soggy bun. Actually tastier than it sounds. But not much.

So, you know, it's not bad at all. But there's not the infinite and ever-changing range of choices that even a smallish city in America can offer...which translates to less temptation overall. Those gyros wraps may be good, but you don't feel like eating them every week.

The food here is terrible, and the portions are too small.--Woody Allen

I am not the first to notice that portions are smaller in Europe than they are in the US. In fact, it's one of the most obvious and most-highlighted differences in the food culture of the two continents. 

Now, let me be crystal clear.  US-style portions are fantastic. Two meals -- three meals even -- for the price of one!  The American dinner plate, piled high with steaming delights is a national treasure, up there with the Statue of Liberty, the Grand Canyon and Yellowstone Park, country music, Broadway musicals and the Kardashians.

 You see, I feel absolutely no moral superiority about not getting value for money on my plate here in Europe relative to the American.  I can't relate to that at all. I'm always mystified at Europeans online who seem to think that they have achieved some frugal form of  austere perfection due to the fact that the restaurants they dine in offer them less food for their Euro than an American one would. I guess it's connected to some vague idea of decadance and waste. Europeans, living in one of the most decadant places on earth, where life is cushy and easy relative to the rest of the world can force down their guilt at not being one of the less fortunate and eagerly point to the USA, managing to get their post-War self-righteous sense of nationalism on. God Bless America the scapegoat.Perhaps it's just a question of upbringing and how I've been unwittingly shaped by my culture.

Because I have to admit that the more you put on your plate, the more likely you are to eat more--too much, in fact. I went to a diner in Denver Colorado on my last trip to the USA: I ordered a beef and cheese burrito smothered in green chile, cheese and sour cream, shredded lettuce and diced tomatoes with a side of brown rice and refried beans. $12.95. (or in Czech terms, over 300 kc.  A high-calorie indulgence no matter how you slice it…but the size is what staggered me. It was the length of my forearm and twice as wide! I ate two thirds of the burrito and gave up, stuffed, saving the rest for breakfast. The two thirds that I ate was still more than an entire portion of food that I would get in a typical restaurant in the Czech Republic.


Above: A typical American burrito
By contrast, yesterday I went out for lunch and got a shopska salad for lunch. Good-sized, but honestly cucumbers, tomatoes and onions, even with a generous sprinkling of Balkan cheese are no match for the calorific euphoria of an American burrito cooked in the West in a real live diner by real live Mexicans migrants on their sixteenth hour of work!  

 But I have to admit that the typical portion that I would get in a Czech restaurant -- including the lovely Shopska salad I had yesterday -- is still generally pretty satisfying. I never go away feeling ripped off -- unless I've just come from America, of course.

But...I wonder how Americans would deal with a restaurant that served them half- or third-sized portions -- portions that in the Europe would seem completely par-for-the-course. Would they....riot? Demand to see a manager? Or would the restaurant bill itself as fine dining and charge twice as much for half as much? Or would prices go down, making waiting tables a job even less desirable than it already is and significantly impacting the economy? 

Because Americans eat out a LOT.

I'm gonna try me a cheeseburger here. I've eaten here before, but I've never tried a burger from here. --Salem Rana

ON visits home, I'm staggered by the amount of eating out a lot of people do. (Especially single people.) And I remember how much I used to eat out as a single man back in the day. Pizza delivery, Asian/Thai/Chinese takeaway, fast food drive-thru on the way home for work, dinner and a movie on Friday night, breakfast brunch! Steak and egg specials! Diners and ommelettes and hash-browned potatoes after too many drinks on a Saturday night! 

And there is something about the whole experience of eating out which is so nice in America. The way the music plays in the background, not too loud nor too soft, atmospheric but not intrusive. The way the colors of the walls and the colors on the plate and the plush carpet cushioning your steps and the creamy skin and bright teeth of the waitress serving you combine to make the experience pleasant...amazing...orgasmic. Restaurants strive to give you an experience that you remember, that you hang up and frame in the gallery of your memory.
Above: a typical Mexican restaurant.

 Maybe that's why we eagerly place our social meetings in the context of food and eating. On my visit to New York, I met with several old, dear friends of mine from my youth in a small midwestern college. When talking to them I remember that so many of my memories of these friends involved eating together, laughing, playing with our food in the school's cafeteria. 

It's no wonder that we all sprang at the opportunity to eat together once more in a reunion that was all too short, but perhaps all the sweeter for it. 

In a lot of ways, American life revolves around food in a way that Czech or Northern European life doesn't. The kitchen is just as likely to be a family's social heart in the US as the living room. And there is something really heart-warming about that fact. I like it. But the cultural prominence of food probably does encourage weight gain and the higher rates of obesity found in the USA.

In Central Europe, food seems to play a much more functional role. A delicious one, to be sure, but a smaller one. Oh, I'm not saying that Europeans don't have their feasts: the bane of my existence is the heaping plates of grilled chicken, pork steaks and sausage at any of the numerous birthday barbecues my Czech family holds over the summer; and I am still full from the 4-hour-long 7 course meal my girlfriend's father put on for his 70th birthday celebration at a local restaurant last November. And then there is the Zabijačka,  a legendary celebration the name of which comes from the verb zabit 'to kill'--a day-long beer-drenched mega-party centered around the slaughter, dismemberment and cooking up of the various parts of a full-grown pig.

Above: a typical Czech pass-time


But generally, we eat out less, our meals are smaller, they are faster and they are more efficient. I can go to a restaurant for lunch on a working day and the whole experience will cost less than ten dollars and  ast less than a half-hour--and this is at a sit-down restaurant with a beautiful young waitress attending on my needs. (Though not so attentively as the American waitress, I must add.) And if it all falls somehow short of the euphoric experience that the American eater craves when he eats out, so be it. After all, life is about the valleys and the plains as much as the mountain peaks, ne cést pas?



Now what this means is that there is more home cooking in Europe.

More meals are cooked at home: and the ready-made frozen or canned food that is so ubiquitous in Yankee-land is pretty rare here: with good reason. Nothing beats a frozen green chile burrito in the USA, properly prepared and microwaved to perfection. If I'm ever, God forbid,  put on death row, my last meal is going to be three frozen Little Juan green chile burritos smothered with slabs of swiss and cheddar cheese, sour cream with a dessert of red Twizzlers and Doctor Pepper. I mean, I figure if you are going to die, you might as well attempt to clog your arteries and die from a massive coronary before they strap you down.  One last effort of controlling your own destiny before you're thrown all unwillingly into the void.
But Here, the ready-made food kind of…blows. On a death row here, if one existed, I'd probably just ask for a pear or something. European junk food has just not got that amazing nasty tastiness that American food has. So naturally, it's not very popular. 

I can put it no plainer than this: American crap food is GOOD. European junk food is BAD. People cook from scratch a lot more here. And here is the dirty little secret: cooking meals from scratch is actually not that hard!And it's delicious!

Less Snacking:

Speaking of food, another thing I noted in America. No matter where I was there: New York, Denver, Yellowstone, the Midwest, the Northeast, the South, in the country, in the city…people walking down the road were SNACKING. Chips. Pretzels. A hastily purchased chili dog. Candy bars. I mean everywhere. Ev. Ry. Where. Everybody. Fat people. Thin people. Young people. Old people. In their cars. Walking down the road. Munch. Crunch. Slurp. Gurgle. Burp.

In Europe I see some people walking down the road and snacking. But not many. And they are all overweight.  The one exception, the one indulgence they allow themselves is an ice-cream cone on a hot summer's day. So, my theory is, in America if these snackers which you see everywhere are not overweight, they are all either on the way to the gym, on the way from the gym, or on the way to obesity. 

Strangely it's made me self-conscious about snacking here in Europe. I now no longer snack in public. Instead, if I need to eat something, I huddle in my car, head down, knees up, furtively nibbling on a granola bar,  safe out of sight from the fit hordes.


But it's not all food culture that accounts for the fat vs fit stereotypes. Lifestyle plays a huge part in it, too.

Public Transport 

European towns are naturally more compact and it becomes a lot more convenient to either take public transport or just walk to where you want to go, provided of course you don't have a lot to carry or don't need to speed from place to place. And you don't mind body odor on a hot summer's day. A lot…and I mean a LOT more people walk to work, school, or the nearest transport stop.

By contrast in America…I mean, let's face it, outside of the biggest cities(and sometimes even there)  Americans practically live in their cars. It's unbelievable how much time we spend there…driving to the library…driving to work…driving from shop to shop…driving to pick up kids from wherever kids go…Even in a smallish cities like my hometown in Springfield Missouri, I have no doubt that the average person spends minimally two hours per day in the car. We laugh and love, grow up, weep, argue, and reflect in cars. We devise new philosophies and innovate old ways in the secluded comfort of our cars with the air conditining blowing cold, drying out our sinuses and making us crave a delicious ice-filled cup of cola.  I lost my virginity in a car! Babies are conceived and born alike in cars! Nothing symbolizes America more than the car.

above:  a typical American car
Living out your life behind the wheel  of course has two effects on the human organism:  the first is naturally less calories get burned and of course the second is that also encourages consumption of fast food in a landscape which has evolved to cater to the American driver. Because when it's 6.30 on a Wednesday night sometimes you are just too tired to go home and whip up a three course meal for the clamoring horde. And some genius figured that out long ago. It was probably Ronald MacDonald himself.

Sport:

 I know that Sports are popular in America. My god, my Facebook feed explodes with a collective orgasm every Super Bowl Sunday.
(above: a typical Superbowl Sunday)

But in Europe more people actually do sport. A lot more, in fact. We walk, we cycle, we play soccer and floorball. We jog, we swim, we rollerblade. Maybe it's just my country and my region, but sometimes it seems like the number one hobby for just about every body is some sort of sport. Frankly, its boring. But they get into it. They get all the gear,  the spandex, the specific sneakers scientifically designed specifically for squash or soccer or basketball. My girlfriend buys me jackets to be worn when and only when I'm hiking to the top of a mountain. She has a whole closetful of clothes devoted to running. The knees and heads of Europeans gleam with plastic knee-guards and space-age helmets, their wrists sport gadgets measuring their speed, distance and the calories burned in their excursions. 
(above: a typical European on a typical Saturday)

While the awful hot, humid weather that prevails in most of the Midwest discourages outdoor sport, there's still plenty of opportunity for indoor sport in air-conditioned comfort. But fewer Americans take that opportunity. (Probably due to lack of time because we are ALWAYS IN OUR CARS.)

But there is a lesson to be learned here. When everybody is doing some sort of exercise it seems natural to sort of join in. The more people do it, the more it becomes the thing to do. This kind of thing has a snowball effect on a culture. If everybody in your vicinity talks about the awesome stuffed crust pizza they had last night, you are more likely to have a stuffed crust pizza! Likewise, if everyone around you runs a marathon every Saturday and goes on and on about it…well, you just might try it yourself. Or if not, you might try something less ambitious but equally sporty. We're herd animals. In a sporty herd, you get sporty. In a tired out, over fed herd, you don't.

The bitter, bitter irony

And now comes my sheepish confession to you, reader. If indeed you exist and have made it this far and I'm not just typing this for the eyes of oblivion. 
In a cruel but hilarious twist of fate, I, after moving to Europe from America, got fat. 


But I'm the exception that proves the rule. I am unusually less active here than I was living in the Big City in my twenties without a car. My job is sedentary and I spend a lot of time in a car. I do go on my walks four to five times a week(7.5 kms around town, up and down hills) and I haven't  really gained any rate for several years; I eat plenty of fruit and vegetables and regulate my fat and carb intake. But the fact remains. I am fat. A fat American living in Europe. A living sculpture erected to national stereotypes everywhere.