Sunday, January 31, 2016

How Do Europeans Feel about Americans?


Note: this post got blocked on Facebook as 'abusive.' 
Go figure.

Oddly, people who don't have a lot of experience with Americans either seem to think far too highly of the USA and it's inhabitants; or far too negatively about them.

Maybe this is true for people all over the world.

From my perspective in the Czech Republic, general opinion tends to be mostly favorable.

Which is not to say there isn't  some negative stereotyping, of course, there is.
And believe me, Americans are magnets for every negative stereotype there is--not only here but everywhere in Europe, I think, judging from things I read on the Internet..
I could spend an hour writing a list of negative qualities that Czechs think Americans possess that I think are ridiculous and unfair.
I will list a few.
Things I've heard:
1. Americans are fat.
2. Americans are lazy.
3. Americans are arrogant.
4. Americans are rude.
5. Americans don't love their children like "our nationality".
6. Americans can't cook.
7. Americans are stupid.
8. Americans are health freaks.
9. Americans don't care about other people.
10. Americans are fake.
11. Americans are crazy drivers.
12. White Americans hate black people.
13. Black people and multi-culturism are to blame for America's ills
14. Americans are exactly the same as Russians--only they chew gum.
15. Americans are prudes.
16. Americans are obsessed with sex.
17. Americans hate gays.
18. Americans are gay.
19. Americans are wildly xenophobic and hate people from abroad.
20. Americans are(fill in negative adjective here.)
Really, you can get depressed when you see the way that some people look at Americans. It's awful. Dehumanizing.

But, conversely they also appreciate aspects of our culture--not only movies and music. OR...they absolutely hate it!
Some aspects they see in American culture:
1.friendliness,
2. openness,
3.the helping hand of strangers.
4. And there are some who praise the laissez-faire approach to economics. (I don't think the USA is really all that laissez-faire in actuality, but it has that reputation among Europeans,  and some of them really like that, while others don't.)
6. Sometimes people think that Americans live without problems, that our lives are happy, that we are all well-off and life is simpler.
7. That our government may not be perfect but it's less corrupt(rather than just being corrupt in a different way.)
You can find negative and positive attitudes in any group of Europeans--sometimes they happily coexist in individuals.
It's somewhat dependent on the individual European, of course: a Christian European will see Americans Christianity as a positive thing; an atheist will see it as a negative thing.

The USA itself is responsible for the vast range of opinions(good and bad).

 Americans don't really think about it, but culture, media, music, films, TV is actually a major American export. Europe is bombarded by American culture and American media in a way that Americans would find...weird. This really shapes European's view of America and Americans. And maybe distorts it a little.
Because Europe naturally looks outward at the world and observes it, due to history and geography, and the US naturally looks inward at itself.
The USA, for all it's flag-waving tendencies is far more self-critical than most European countries.

My opinion..

But anyway, of course, the more Europeans have contact with real Americans, the more specific and less stereotypical their beliefs are going to be.
And vice/versa, of course.

A Song Of Ice and Fire: Who is the most respected man in Westeros?

There are many men who are respected in Game of Thrones and for many different reasons.
1. Some might say the most respected man is Tywin Lannister.
He certainly strikes fear in the heart of most of WEsteros. He is rich, commands huge armies and if you laugh at him he'll kill you, your best friend, your family, your dog, your cat, burn your house down, pee in your lawn, hunt your school teachers down and he'll kill them too.
People definitely don't mess with him.
But once he's gone, his whole empire crumbles and his legacy looks like it's already sputtered out.
2. Some will say Barristan the Bold.
Barristan the Bold is like the Mohammed Ali of Westeros. He's worshipped the way 8 year olds worship sports stars.
He's venerated, celebrated, unmated.
He always does what he thinks is the most honorable thing. He's one of the top swordsmen in Westeros, one of the greatest jousters (at 63! I think) and he can kick an armed man's ass with nothing but a stick.
But he got kicked out of the King's Guard because there was one person who didn't respect him. Cersei Lannister. Yeah, she's an idiot. But she's the Queen. She downvoted him.
A downvote from Cersei is like a downvote from Garrick Saito to the courtiers that surround her.

3. But the most respected is Ned Stark.
  • He led a rebellion that overthrew a dynasty that had lasted nearly 300 years.
  • He (allegedly) killed Ser ARthur Dayne, the Sword of the Morning.
  • He nailed Ashara Dayne! The Babe of Babes!(or maybe he didn't, may be just gossip.)
  • He held the North together and ruled through his personality. Loved and respected.
  • And the ones who didn't love him(the Boltons) kept their peace and obeyed his call to banners.
Yes, he died. But he died honorably. Or rather he was dishonorably murdered. Anybody who knows him knows that the charge of treason was trumped up.
But death is not the worst thing that can happen to you. All Men Must Die. Valar Morghulis.
It's how you die that matters. And how you live that matters more.
You have two choices:
Would you rather die
              1) knowing your children, at least some of them, were going to be looked after and that your line was as secure as it could be in the hands of your vassals;  or...            
                2) shot by your child while you were taking a crap.
Which do you choose?
His death was the catalyst of an uprising that threatens to overthrow the Bolton regime in its infancy and put his children back where they belong: in power, in Winterfell, ruling the North like they've done for 8000 years.
The North Remembers.
"The Wolves will return."--Jojen Reed
Ned Stark is the most respected man in Game of Thrones.

Saturday, January 30, 2016

On Crazy Accusations against President Obama

The sheer number of accusations against Obama is pretty insane, even if you disregard the ones stating he's the anti-Christ or some lizard-creature from outer space.

With Obama, apparently, we have the first homosexual Communist Muslim atheist Kenyan devil-worshipping President who doesn't parent properly.

Take that, Rest of World!

Seriously though, I wish that someone would take some time to look into it, really study it.
It's a truly interesting social phenomenon. Maybe after he's out of office and the smoke clears....

Of course it doesn't start with Obama: for most of Clinton's term, The Republicans, Newt Gingrich and Kenneth STarr investigated Clinton for various rumors and scandals--that's how we got Monica Lewinsky, remember? They weren't investigating Clinton's sex life: they were investigating an investment he made.
In the end, they went with the sex and jumped on the plagiarism thing.

And of course, I'd be a partisan hack if I didn't admit that the hatred I and others felt for George W Bush during his term bordered on the irrational.

Remember when he lost in 2004? I literally wept. Perhaps a bit overdramatic!

But then I had just moved to Europe and if there's one thing that unites Europeans it's hatred of George Bush. I didn't want to get the blame! Hey! What about 49 perccent of Americans who didn't vote for him(or the the 51 percent in 2000, don't get me started on that!!! Don't tar us all with the same brush, Euros!*

There were more than a few comparisons of Bush and Hitler back then among Democrats and the international community. I always said that wasn't fair: he was more like Kaiser Wilhelm than Hitler.

But now, he's gone and I realize he was just a president, not an emperor or a king. He screwed up, and we're all paying for it now.

In retrospect, I feel that the European hatred of George Bush, though couched in righteous anger and fear for an imperial US too big for its britches was more about the arrogant approach to diplomacy that categorized the early Bush administration in the first four years.

Assholes(pardon my French) like Rumsfeld Cheney, and the execrable John Bolton seemed hell-bent on saying things to piss off Europeans, especially the more nationalist nations of the Western EU(France!)

And Europeans felt the lack of respect keenly.

Of course, looking at the circumstances why France, Germany, Russia and even Canada opposed the invasion of Iran makes you think that morality and ethics and International Law had less to do with it than just good old-fashioned self-interest. But at least that self-interest did coincide with the wishes of the People, so the self-righteous bench they sat on  did have some kind of authority.

And I think the rich irony of France and the UK practically dragging the US, kicking and screaming, into the short action in Libya and then having to step aside for the US because they ran out of bullets plays into this, at least in my thoughts.

Countries are hypocritical. Nothing really new here.




But this is about OBAMA.

However vehemently and dramatically we might have opposed Bush, nothing compares to the flack Obama gets.

I'm actually worried about him. NOt while he's in office but afterwards.

For long I've thought that Obama's career was only just beginning; after he gets out of his office he would be able to utilize his (considerable, undrestimated) power as world icon to do a lot of good for the world and for the USA.

But in the last few years, thanks to Facebook which might be the most effective method of measuring racism I've ever seen,  I've discovered that there is a portion of white Americans who are really uncomfortable with black people in general. Who work actively towards jailing them. Even if it's just spreading propaganda on Facebook.

They don't call themselves racists, they don't think they would do this to someone who didn't deserve it, but they do this. .

When you call for standing up to an oppressive government in one post and then in the next support the government's VERY questionable shooting of a shoplifting bully(as if that was an execution-worthy offense), I literally get chills.

There is a deep fear that runs through some white people, a fear that says: good or bad, the best thing to do is lock 'em all away. A fear that justifies doing this even to innocent people.

And, of course I see everything through an American prism. Or, more specifically, through an American-emigrant-to-Europe prism.

Maybe it's human nature. Maybe it's not even fear. Maybe humans have a cruel streak that will exercise itself when it's in a position of power no matter what.

But the Obama accusations seem a lot like fear to me.


I just wish the human race could get over this shit.







A Song of Ice and Fire: Why didn't Tywin Lannister disinherit Tyrion if he hates him so much?


Why didn't Tywin disinherit Tyrion?
But...
Tywin did disinherit Tyrion. And to ensure that he stayed disinherited he planned to send him to the Wall. Though that plan went down the toilet. Literally.
And the reason why he did so is below.
Artwork by Magali Villeneuve
Under Westerosi law, Tyrion is the rightful heir to Casterly Rock. Jaime has forfeited his right to it by joining the King's Guard.
"What do I want, you ask? I'll tell you what I want. I want what is mine by rights. I want Casterly Rock."
Hiw father's mouth grew hard. "Your brother's birthright?"
"The knights of the Kingsguard are forbidden to marry, to father children, and to hold land....The day Jaime put on that white cloak, he gave up his claim to Casterly Rock, but you never once have you acknowledged it....I want you to stand up before the realm and proclaim that I am your son and your lawful heir.
Lord Tywin's eyes were a pale green flecked with gold, as luminous as they were merciless. ""Casterly Rock," he declared in a flat cold dead tone. And then, "Never."...
"Why?"
"You ask that? You, who killed your mother to come into the world? You are an ill-made, devious, disobedient, spiteful little creature full of envy, lust and low cunning. Men's laws give you the right to bear my name and display my colors since I cannot prove you are not mine. To teach me humility, the gods have condemned me to watch you waddle about wearing that proud lion that was my father's sigil and his father's before him. But either gods nor me shall ever compel me to let you turn Casterly Rock into your whorehouse."...
..."Go back to your bed, Tyrion, and speak to me no more of your rights to Casterly Rock. You shall have your reward, but it shall be one I deem appropriate to your servic and station.
Tywin does what he wants.

Thursday, January 28, 2016

Is Europe more racist than the USA?

It's difficult to measure something like racism, of course.
And it's a sensitive subject because few people anywhere want to be called a racist or thought of as a racist.
Certainly racist attitudes exist in Europe and in some cases are voiced quite openly--much more openly than in most cities in America in my experience.
Or maybe, it's more that the racists in America tend to be so obviously uneducated and from a certain lower-class--I knew some rednecks in my hometown who were very open about their racist attitudes; whereas in central Denver, the town I lived longest in the USA, I rarely--perhaps never--heard anything racist from anyone white.
(Not saying that there isn't racism in Denver, of course. Just that I, as a white man, didn't personally witness many racist comments like I did in Southwest Missouri.)
Which is ironic, as my hometown has a relatively low percentage of minorities; whereas Denver was possibly nearly 50% non-white while I was living there.
There might be a lesson there.
This has led me to believe that it's mostly uneducated white people who don't have a whole lot of everyday experience with minorities who voice the most racist things in America.
IN contrast, I've heard racist statements from white collar, highly educated Europeans fairly regularly.

Where I live most of the racism is directed towards local Roma groups(Romany).
The fact is, outside of some urban centers like London and parts of Western Europe, Europe is not really as racially diverse as the USA; furthermore, the history of race and race relations in Europe is completely different and the two facts together inform attitudes towards race in totally different ways.

Racism is America's curse.

Ethno-linguistic nationalism is Europe's curse.

These two 'isms' are similar and there is a lot of  overlap, of course, but they are different things. To an American looking through the prism of racial division, defined in American terms(White*, Native American, African American, Asian, Pacific Islander,), there is very little difference between, say, a German, a Northern Italian, a Bohemian or a Swiss person.
Not necessarily so for a European. And the divisions might be even starker when they compare (say) a Swede to an Englishman to a Croat or a Pole.
Just as America's history is stained with  slavery and the eradication and betrayal of American Indian culture, Europe's history(especially in the last few centuries) is stained with long wars and atrocities committed among ethno-linguistic lines; this is why after WWII the UN approved the forcible removal of German speaking people's from land which they had occupied for centuries(i.e., the Sudetenland, etc): it was simply felt that the mixing of ethno-linguistic groups had been a recipe for trouble.
Nowadays, with a peace in place for many decades held by the NATO alliance, a spirit of cooperation encouraged by the EU and the Schengen Zone and the general homogenizing influence of modern globalism, this bugbear may be finally fading from Europe. Although the rise of far right wing neo-fascist groups and political parties in the last decade do seem to be putting that to the test.

Considering the membership numbers(a minority but not generally a tiny one) of these far right groups, and if you accept ethno-linguistic nationalism as roughly equivalent to racism, I'd say it was about the same.
But this is really talking about the human heart.
The system is far less racist than America's I think ,especially when you consider America's love affair with incarceration in general; there is no doubt in my mind that black Americans who commit crimes are much more likely to be incarcerated for certain offenses than white Americans--this is something that is easily proven by statistics.
Is the same true in Europe? I actually don't know.
But European sentences for criminals tend to be far less harsh than American sentences, so even if it is, you have fewer people locked away for good (and no death penalty at all.) Which is at least something.
So on the whole, I think that I would say European systems of justice are probably less racist.
We might not ever be able to eradicate unfair discrimination based on race(or ethno-linguistic background) from the heart of humankind; but maybe we  can eradicate it from our systems, at least.
My feeling is that Europe does a better job with this.

*I use the word 'white' as I simply abhor the term 'Caucasian.' In what imaginary world do white people hail from the Caucausus?



A Song of Ice and Fire/Game of Thrones: Did Shae ever truly love Tyrion?

In the show, I think she did.
She was a little irrationally jealous of his marriage to Sansa, and generally acted, even behind his back like she honored and loved him.
I think the tragedy that the show tried to convey(and maybe just barely pulled off), was that Tyrion wasn't able to communicate the danger he felt Shae to be in. And that, because of that lack of communication, she betrayed him, because she felt betrayed.
(I think that's a ridiculously silly story, by the way. But that's how I undestood it.)


I also  felt that her testimony at the trial was soemthing she was uncomfortable with and that she had clearly been coerced or scared into it. Her lie about Tyrion making her call him 'Her Giant of Lannister' was meant to hurt Tyrion, more than anything.
Her being with Tywin was simply a matter of her falling back on her main skillset: sex.
The tragedy of the show is that Tyrion loved Shae but had to push her away, which wounded her and sent her running to his enemies. For her betrayal and to protect himself, he killed her.
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
In the books, she didn't love him
I do think that she didn't mind being Tyrion's and might have dreamed of living a semi-independent life as his mistress. 
Shae didn't mind his marriage to Sansa ("You'll give her a big belly and come back to me"). She had  warm friendly relationship with him in A Clash of Kings when she was living in luxury at the manse in King's Landing, but I read it more as a warm whore-client relationship than a real love affair; and her attitude chananged when Tyrion
            a)slapped her when she insisted on coming to court
             b) took back the jewels and rich clothing he'd given her
             c) refused to let her come to court
            b) installed her as Lollys's handmaid(later as Sansa's).
But she's a much colder person in the books. Think about show Shae's  protective attitude towards Sansa, her fierce protective sympathy in general. Now compare that to book Shaes reaction to Lollys' shock and trauma after being raped by 'half a hundred men': "All they did was fuck her."
Her betrayal at Tyrion's trial was not the reaction of a wounded lover; her lies were much worse than Show Shae's, painting a picture in which Tyrion basically kept her as a sex slave through threats ; in the books, she really did call him her Giant of Lannister in intimate moments and it really did please him--and she cruelly used that to make him a laughing stock. But her whole tearful performance,  her lies about him humiliating her prove to me that it was nothing more than the gleeful spite of a whore using his misfortune to attain an even higher position, namely, marriage to a knight. (Cersei had promised her that, it's revealed in A Feast for Crows.)
The Tragedy of the book is that Tyrion, psychologically traumatized by his father's savage lie; the atrocity of seeing his first wife raped and being forced by Tywinto rape her in turn; and having his brother, the only member of his family who loves him be an accomplice in this crime of his father's,   has twisted Tyrion into a being who feels that he is incapable of attaining love for anyone unless he pays for it first. He kills Shae because of his deep hurt that she is nothing more than an opportunistic whore who used him.
          

Monday, January 25, 2016

Do Czech People Speak English?


In Prague it's always been pretty good--well, at least for the time I've been here. I rarely even hear Czech when I'm visiting the main tourist areas of Prague.
In the smaller cities it's improving rapidly.   I live in a small rural town(population 30 000) near the Slovak border and I own what is one of the biggest language schools in my region; so I've had a bird's eye view of how English skills have developed over the last decade.
Overall, I'd estimate the amount of people at an intermediate level or higher in small town(not village) Czech Republic to be at about 30 percent.
Professionals/White collar workers:
In general, the middle class tends to have a real eagerness to learn English: their jobs demand it, they want to speak on holidays and so on.
  • In my small rural town, many professionals do speak English--most I would say in fact. Their level ranges from pre-intermediate to very advanced. However...
  • People with a technical or engineering background tend to be on the lower end of this spectrum; they have greater problems because language learning is not prioritized at the technical engingeering universities. 
This is a real shame as the Czechs have traditionally displayed a real strength in engineering and technical matters that could easily be exported to the world and I would argue that the lack of English skills in technicians and engineers is handicapping the Czech image abroad, especially in Western countries.
AS a result I've had a fair few clients sign up for expensive individual courses after graduating as many of the international companies that the Czech Republic's economy is based on require English for their technical positions.
  • Economists, salespeople, lawyers, doctors, bankers and top executives nearly all speak very good English; many of them at a pretty advanced level.
  • IT professionals(and there are many in the Czech Republic) speak English quite well, but tend to have problems with appropriacy and social niceties and even sometimes hypothetical situations...though I think that might be about their own 'geek'  personalities and the Czech Republic's cultural valuing of the practical and the physical.
AS for young people, again, it's a mixed bag.
Students
  • Gymnazium students in particular have improved in leaps and bounds with most of them achieving B2 and a fair few achieving C1 or even C2 level on the Common European Framework.
  • Students in more vocational or technical schools tend to have a much lower level of English, with an average of A2 level, despite a few bright stars. Again, the system seems to de-prioritize English for these students just as it does in universities.
  • University students nearly always speak English pretty well, again, with the exception of the technical students mentioned above.
In theory, all students taking the Maturita exams(roughly equivalent to Britains O-levels) should be at B1 level ; but some of them do not take the language exam; and I can assure that a minority of 19-20 year olds from the vocational-technical schools really are B1 level.
Blue collar people
(caveat: it gets harder for me to accurately assess the abilities of most blue-collar abilities because I speak Czech and deal with them in Czech and they don't tend to take English classes(lack of money and lack of interest being the primary reasons, I would say)
  • common factory workers, shop assistants, mechanics and the like usually do not speak English with a few exceptions.
  • However, It's not uncommon for a waiter or waitress or other service personnel to speak a little English nowadays, exceptions being perhaps in some smaller villages.
Pensioners, etc:
Older people, even highly educated ones, tend to not speak English, as has been pointed out by others on this thread.
Most of them do understand Russian and many of them might get by in German. In my area, there are some Polish speakers as well, mainly because of proximity to the Polish border and growing up with some Polish TV channels. Of course, nearly everybody speaks, or rather understands Slovak, although some children have a resistance towards it at first.

What are some red flags when going out on dates?

Having been in a relationship for the last two centuries--er, I mean ten years, it's been a while since I've 'dated' in the field. So my info might be a little dated. 
Still I've got fond memories of many women and the reasons why I wasn't interested in having a relationship with them. This isn't meant to be too serious or anything. But these were always warning signs that may have kept me from getting too close.
Anyway, take this post for what it's worth: which isn't all that much. 

1. Complaining about ex boy friends. Viciously.
2. Drinking WAY TOO MUCH.
3. Acting as if we are in a Hallmark Valentines Day advertisement even though we barely know each other.
4. An obsession with superficialities: other people's looks, possessions, etc.
5. Ill-treatement of staff serving us or other strangers.
6. An irrational negative attitude to other women.
And then there's the indescribable 'warning bell' that goes off for a reason that you're not sure of.
Listen to the warning bell.

A Song of Ice and Fire: What are some of Jon Snow's flaws?


Jon Snow is quite a heroic character in a fantasy series where there's a remarkable dearth of them.
. He's smart, he's quick, he strong, he's a good swordsman with a magical Valyrian steel sword. He's a good and mostly accurate judge of character and he has a compassionate heart and a sense of honor that guides his action. He intuitively understands and relates to outsiders like his sister Arya and he's got a magical direwolf that he can possess when the going gets tough. He's everything a reader could want in a probable Azor Ahai.
Jon Snow exhibits quite a few flaws, though they can be difficult to catch for the reader who sees things almost exclusively through his eyes or Sam's. Some of them he learns to deal with, while others ultimately bring him down.
Oddly some of the flaws are, parodoxically, his greatest strenghts. His heroic traits and sensitivity, his greatest qualities are ultimately the flaws that bring him down and leave him bleeding his life away in the snow.
Jon is moody
Jon is moody and tends to let his emotions get the better of him.
Let's take as exhibit A his escape from the Royal Feast at Winterfell, tears in his eyes. Yes, he was 14 and drunk. Who among us hasn't done similar in our drunken youths? But this quality does stay with him to a certain extent.
Witness the brutal beatings he deals out to his brothers under Ser Alliser's care and his high-handed, uppity manner when he first comes to Caste Black. His entitled sense of injury, his deep feeling that he's better than everyone else.
Sure, Jon gets over this in a quick spurt of emotional growth and by doing so displays some remarkable leadership skills, which is noted and puts him on the track to Lord Commander.
But he remains moody and, as the stress that his family goes though intensifies, he tends to act on it destructively:
  • he attacks his senior officer Ser Alliser with a knife;
  • he breaks his vows, attempting to flee south to join his brother Robb.
Again, he does mature over the course of the series, but after the death of Ygritte and his election to Lord Commander of the watch, I think his moodiness actually increases again. He regresses into the more immature state he entered Castle Black in.
Jon's isolation and the torturned martyr thing
Jon isolates himself from his men, even from his close friends. He even refuses to eat with the other members of the Watch, taking his dinner in his office with only his pet raven and his direwolf as companions. His friends notice this, of course. It's almost as if he's reverted to the uppity Lordling that he entered Castle Black as.
He does this, remembering Eddard Stark's teachings:
[Grenn] hesitated. "My lord, will you sup with us? Owen, shove over and make room for Jon. Jon wanted nothing more. No, he had to tell himself, those days are gone....They had chosen him to rule. The Wall was his, and their lives were his as well. A lord may love the men that he commands, he could hear his lord father saying, but he cannot be a friend to them. One day he may need to sit in judgment on them , or send them forth to die. "Another day," the lord commander{Jon} lied.
--A Dance with Dragons
This seems fair enough on the surface. Except it's an extreme, melodramatic and, yes, teenagery interpretation of his father's words. Because Ned did not hold himself aloof from his men. ON the contrary he cultivates a warm relationship with them. He regularly eats with them and jokes with them.
[Arya's] father used to say that a lord neded to eat with his men, if he hoped to keep them. "Know the men who follow you," she heaard him tell Robb once, "and let them know you. Don't ask your men to die for a stranger." At Winterfell,, he always had an extra seat set at his own table, and every day a different man would be asked to join him. One night it would be Vayon Poole , and the talk would be coppers and bread stores and servants. The next time it would be Mikken....Another day it mighit be Hullen with his endless horse talk...or Septon Chayle, or Jory, or Ser Rodrik, or even Old Nan with her stories.  Arya had loved nothing better than to sit at her father's table and listen to them talk....
--A Game of Thrones
Now it's possible that Ned Stark told Jon and Robb(and Arya) two different things. But I think it's much much more likely that Jon, falling prey to his latent moodiness(a trait he shares with his assumed biological father, Rhaegar Targaryenand general gloom has simply chosen a path of tortured martyred isolation and cherry picked the many things his father had to say on the subject of leadership.
And it is really melodramatic:
When he finally put the quill down, the room was dim and chily, and he could fele its walls closing in. Perched above the window, the Old Bear's raven peered down at him with shrewd black eyes. My last friend, Jon thought ruefully....Jon rose and climbed the steps to the narrow bed that had once been Donal Noyes. This is my lot, he realized as he undressed, from now until the end of my days.
--A Dance with Dragons
I mean, it's so....goth.(Bolded for extra blackness.) He even wears black all the time and hangs out with a talking raven, just like Edgar Allen Poe.
And lest it be forgotten, the Old Bear never did this.
The Old Bear ate with his men, laughed with his men, told stories with his men. They still knifed him in the back. Well,  it's all the easier to knife someone when that person really doesn't talk to you except to give you orders and behaves towards you as if you're a stupid bigoted fool. With this style of uncommunicative leadership, you could arguethat Jon Snow, despite his obvious strengths of character is ultimately more of a Stannis than a Ned Stark, at least in the eyes of his subordinates.
Communication problems
Remember, Ned Stark didn't need to play a political game with the men from his household. He may have held himself arm's length to a certain exent but he dined with them, he joked with him, he hung out with him and he led them.  And they loved and respected him. T
Jon Snow wants to lead the same way as the (foster) father he idealizes; but he neglects to take the steps that Ned Stark consciously took to ensure his men's loyaty. This is a flaw. And then, lacking this personal touch , he also refuses to play politics with them, either. They don't love him; and he does nothing really to gain their respect or to persuade them.
And really, that's it, isn't it. He's a visionary; he has leadership skills in spades(black, black spades) but he lacks the maturity, life experience and knowledge of his senior officers to communicate and persuade them in the face of their adversity: which he dismisses altogether.
This is not to say Jon is wrong. When he categorizes the likes of Bowen Marsh as short-sighted, stupid or bigoted, he is justified.
But he never really considers their point of view; he never realizes that, if the majority, or even a powerful minority of the Night's WAtch opposes his decisions, that is in and of itself a problem that he needs to deal with.
Which is weird.
Because Jon Snow knows exactly how he's seen in the eyes of many. He may have won the election, but he did not get every single vote and some of his men are bitterly opposed to his leadership. He is not unaware of this problem. He's actually a good judge of character and very intelligent.
But he refuses to deal with it. It's his way or the highway. This is a flaw.
When you think about the considerable opposition his absolutely radical ideas bring about (and he does think about it, he knows it's going to happen), you'd think that his intelligence would prod him into taking steps. Especially after he's gotten a warning from a magical fire-witch who sees the future in the flames!
How is it he doesn't see that his decisions and his men's discomfort of them might lead to...what it led to? Because he's a 16 year old. And, maybe, just maybe, it fits into his subconscious self-image as a hero-martyr.
Which leads me to his next flaw.
Hero Complex.
Tyrion famously categorizes Daenerys Targaryen as a 'helper', seeing her compassionate urge to help the downtrodden as the key to her heart, the way to manipulate her.
Jon is actually similar.
He seems unable to to help himself from helping people in need. Of course this is a heroic trait.
But it's also something that probably undermines his authority and reputation with his men, espeicially when it's served with a stubborn refusal to communicate the reasons behind his actions. And it bites him in the end.  Now some of this is kept hidden from them. But some of it is done in the sight of everyone.
  • Fearing that Melisandre will sacrifice Mance Rayder's infant son for his precious King's Blood, he switches the baby with Craster's infant son and sends the former to Oldtown, to keep him safe. 
  • He rescues Alys Karstark from a forced marriage with her uncle(who have gone over to the Boltons. To ensure her safety, he marries her to the Magnar of Thenn, effectively playing the role of King in the North with this role.
  • He sends Mance Rayder and his spearwives on a covert mission to rescue his sister Arya(actually the imposter Jeyne Poole) from a horrible marriage to the son and heir of the Warden of the North. This is a horrific risk that he takes with the Night's Watch, considering the inability of Castle Black to defend against an army from the south and Ramsay Bolton's psychopathic, violent tendencies..
  • In a decision that makes me think that the greatness of his Targaryen nature is passing over into madness, he decides to send the Night's Watch on another Great Ranging to save the beleaguered and probably doomed Wildlings and Eastwatchmen at Hardhome.
The Night's Watch Takes No Part: but Jon definitely does--and that isn't wise
Repeatedly, we're told that the "Night's WAtch takes no part' a guiding maxim that has kept the Night's Watch from meddling in WEsterosi politics for thousands of years. There have been Lord Commanders in the past who have broken this maxim, some even going so far as invading the North with an army of Wildlings.
Jon Snow, aware of this maxim, struggles to tread the line between keeping and breaking his oaths. On the one hand, he hates the Lannisters and Boltons and quite openly(to Sam) declares that he wants to see them go down and suffer. He struggles to even write a letter to the Lannister-held Iron Throne.
"Why would [Lord Tywin] help us now? He never did before."[says Jon to Sam]
"Well, he will not want ti said that Stannis rode to the defense of the realm whilst King Tommen was playing with his toys. That would bring scorn down upon House Lannister.
"It's death and destruction I want to bring down upon House Lannister, not scorn."
I mean, sure, it's understandable. And he does send the letter in the end(though of course, as he predicted, it does no good.)
But this doesn't stop here. AS time goes by he warms to the idea of Stannis as king more and more and advises him with his prodigious knowledge of the North. He advises him not to attack the Dreadfort, and strike for Deepwood Motte instead. Furthermore he tells him exactly how to do it and where he can turn to in the north for men and exactly the approach that he needs to take to win the Northerners over to his cause.
Adding to the aforementioned rescue of Alys Karstark and meddling in Northern politics. During which time he imprisons Cregan Karstark in an ice cell, holding him for Stannis to judge. (And then literally forgets about him!)
Finally, he decides to lead an army of Wildlings against the Lord of Winterfell. It's often argued that this is a defensive measure, since Ramsay has threatened to destroy Castle Black. This is true, but he's only done so because Jon has meddled directly in his life and Northern politics by trying to abduct his bride from him. Not to mention supported Stannis in the first place, which is all too apparent to his men when he reads out the Pink Letter to them.
Note, I'm not saying that any of these actions aren't justifiable. Or good. Or heroic. Or the right thing to do. They are. But they are not necessarily wise, given his precarious position and the depleted, extremely weak position of the Night's Watch..
And in fact, by supporting Stannis in the first place, he's risked the wrath of the Warden of the North and the Iron Throne.
He's well-suited for the role of Azor Ahai. But he makes quite a few mistakes as Lord Commander.
When coupled with his inability or unwillingness to communicate his ideas and reasons with his men and especially his high-handed treatment of them(as they see it) and his disdain and dismissal of their ideas(wrong as they are) it's ultimately no wonder he was fragged.
Jon Snow becoming Azor Ahai.

Sunday, January 24, 2016

How can I balance an ESL classroom when I have an imbalance of high students and low students in regards to level of English?

If they are wildly different levels, you can't really do it. You must split the class into two and teach two lessons--give the one some busy work while teaching the other. And do it in tandem.
If the differences are relatively minor then there are a variety of techniques:
  • teach to the median level of the class
  • pair strong students with strong, weak students with weak
  • sometimes pair  weak and strong students together: observe which strong students help the weaker one rather than getting impatient or frustrated. Figure out how to use these 'sub-teachers' as helpers.
  • Make the weaker students feel like a valuable part of the class(are they funny? are they clever?)
  • Pair yourself with the weak students some time if the others are bored.
  • Don't expect as much from the weak students. Be happy if they do something within their level.

I've taught in classes in elementary schools where there were several different levels at once.

At that point I followed the syllabus/textbook and just got through it.

Sometimes teaching is a joy. Sometimes it's a job. 

Either way, they're paying you, so you get through it!

A Song of Ice and Fire/Game of Thrones/What happened to Benjen Stark? Is he dead?

There are three possibilities for Benjen Stark as far as I'm considered. And since you asked(thanks!) I'll tell you what they are.
A few wafts of spoilers...read at your own risk.
.
.
.
1. He's alive and on a mission..
I think he's alive.
In A Clash of Kings, while Mormont's force is making camp at the Fist of the First Men, Ghost leads Jon to find what he thinks is a fresh grave. After digging into the dirt Jon uncovers a cache of dragon glass daggers, arrowheads, an old broken horn and it's all wrapped in the black cloak of a Night's Watchman.
I think it's Benjen Stark's cloak.
I think on his last mission he met with the Children of the Forest and he's working with them against the threat of the Others. The Children of the Forest had him plant that cache for Ghost and Jon to find because the dragonglass is one of the few effective weapons against the Others.
Perhaps he knew they were going to be attacked soon.
Where he went from there is anybody's guess. But I think he's headed North. I think he's on a mission, given to him by the Children of the Forest. Something he feels he has to take care of. Something to aid the Realms of Men against the Others.
Maybe Bran already knows his fate.
My main evidence is this. He's a minor character but his name is mentioned HUNDREDS of times. Surely that's only because GRRM wants us to make sure to remember him, right? Remember him and the mystery of his disappearance? The disappearance that caused Jeor Mormont to venture out on a Great Ranging that ended up utterly disastrous to the Castle Black garrison? I mean, what would be the point, story-wise if he's dead.
Unless that is the point. Which leads me to possibility number two.

2. He's dead.
He could be dead. Sometimes people get lost in the wilderness and die. It happens. It happens even today. People wander off the Appallachian trail, or into the jungles of the Amazon and are never heard from again.
And there's textual evidence for it. Fairly damning it is, too.
The raven gave a cackling scream, but the Old Bear smiled through the grey of his beard. “This many men and horses leave a trail even Aemon could follow. On this hill, our fires ought to be visible as far off as the foothills of the Frostfangs. If Ben Stark is alive and free, he will come to us, I have no doubt.”
“Yes,” said Jon, “but … what if …”
“… he’s dead?” Mormont asked, not unkindly.
Jon nodded, reluctantly.
Dead,” the raven said. “DeadDead.”
“He may come to us anyway,” the Old Bear said. “As Othor did, and Jafer Flowers. I dread that as much as you, Jon, but we must admit the possibility.”
Dead,” his raven cawed, ruffling its wings. Its voice grew louder and more shrill. “Dead.”
We don't expect that to happen to someone who's been given so much prominence in this series.
But this wouldn't be the first time that GRRM played with readers' expectations on how stories go.
Far from it.
In fact, he's made himself a household name by playing with readers' expectations.
But I do think it would be anti-climactic if he was dead. Not exactly the jaw-dropper that the Red Wedding was.
But it could be that he is dead..
If so,  then maybe we can look forward to a cheerful family reunion when his frozen reanimated corpse comes lumbering up to a random Stark and gives them a big ole hug of death.
3. He just got lost. Hey, it's a trackless forest. It's not like he has GPS.
(yes, I've read other theories:
He's the Hooded man in Winterfell!
He's Euron Greyjoy in disguise!
He's Daario Naharis!
He's Coldhands....I pretty much consider all of those theories crap. Maybe that's strong language. I mean, I just think those theories vary from the implausible to the pointless to the ridiculous.
That's just me, though.

Friday, January 22, 2016

How can we deal with ESL leaners at low levels?



Here are my Top Ten Tips:
  1.          First try to show beginners any connections their language has to English. Most languages have borrowed words from English. And most students, even complete beginners will have picked up a few words from previous learning experiences or m Show the students that they actually know many words in English even if they don't speak English. DVD, CD, email....etc.
  2. Speak slooooowly but in a natural rhthym. And write everything you say on the board!!! Many students can puzzle out the meaning of a sentence in written English more easily than they can hear and separate the sounds for spoken language.
  3. It helps to think about what you're going to say before the class. You want to avoid talking like a caveman; at the same time, speaking above a student's head can discourage them from learning English. When I first started teaching lower levels, I literally usd to script my instructions onto my lesson plans ahead of time. After a while it became second nature.
  4. Instill a sense of fun into the lessons. Having beginners think of their lessons as fun is one of the keys to gaining a long-time learner. Which is essential if they want to learn English. And essential for your career!
  5. Get them talking as much as you can. I don't care how simple these conversations are. I don't care if they are simply reading a script. I don't care if they are doing something silly. They need to be talking. You don't learn a language by reading a book or memorizing grammar rules. You learn a language by speaking the language.
  6. Repetition, repetition repetition. Along those lines:Revise, revise, revise.
  7. Respect your students. Many of them are cleverer than you are.
  8. Never. Never ever. Never ever ever ever ever NEVER make students feel stupid about mistakes they make. Even if it is really funny. Save the laughter for the teacher's lounge.
  9. Short activities. Variety. Change things up. Get them moving. Learning is tactile. Learning is visual. Learning is intellectual. Learning is silly.
  10. People learn by playing. Use games as a prime tool to get student's producing English.