Sunday, February 28, 2016

Would the countries that are part of the EU be worse off or better off if the Union had never existed?

Mostly worse off:
  • From a security perspective, I think  all of them would be worse off without the EU as a union that has some heft when dealing with local players like Russia. The EU simply has more voice than, say, Lithuania alone. The fact that many EU countries are part of NATO is a big factor in this of course.
  • From a economic perspective, most of them would be worse off without the Union--there is no doubt in my  that Free Trade has boosted business in every part of the EU. Of course manufacturing based economies that are net exporters to the EU benefit the most from this arrangement(Germany, and others.) The exceptions to this would be countries with very high unemployment rates which can be directly attributed to the Euro-crisis, austerity and the lack of a flexible fiscal policy. Countries like Greece, maybe Spain. They would actually better off if they hadn't ever joined the EURO--but worse off if they had stayed outside the EU itself. Here the EU is not the problem; the Euro is.
  • From a position of national sovereignty and national self-determination, all countries would be better off without the EU(or with an EU that was structured differently.) Others might say that the economic and security advantages would balance this out, as well as balancing out the 'Democratic Deficit,' which has been a matter of concern for over a decade. I would tend to agree. But then when I see the rise of angry extremist right- and left-wing nationalist groups in various countries I feel uneasy. Nationalism, when backed against a wall tends to fight back. Like most ideas.

So, in a nutshell: all EU countries are better off with the EU;  but some countries would be better off without the Euro, at least for now; and the ambiguity of national sovereignty inherent in the structure and political culture of the EU is causing some ugly elements to rise to the surface

Game of Thrones/A Song of Ice and Fire(medium length): What's the difference between Arya Stark in the books and in the TV series?

Overall, Id say show Arya hews pretty close to Book Arya's course. Perhaps more so than almost any major character.
But there are some differences.
The first issue is age. Book Arya is nine at the beginning of the series and not-quite-twelve at the end of book five. 
Show Arya starts off as eleven(I believe) and, though the show has a far hazier timeline, characters talk about 'years' having passed.
As a result she looks perfect in season one: by season five she's looking a bit too adult and, er, busty.

Overall both characters get to the same place mentally but book Arya goes through much much more trauma to get there.
And she has more agency from the get-go.(The show really has a problem with female agency, unless it's won with brute strength a la Brienne or illustrates their rather dumb'power is power' theme.)
Book Arya is far more traumatized than the show Arya
She sees much worse at 10 years old than the 12? 13? 14?year old show Arya does.
She just goes through much worse to get to the point where becoming a Faceless Man assassin feels like her most viable option.

  • ON her nightmare journey north to Winterfell, she sees evidence of atrocities, aftermath of atrocities, she witnesses atrocities. Not in the show.
  • She sees dead bodies, whole villages slaughtered. She sees dismembered mothers dying. Not in the show.
  • During the attack  which leaves Yoren and most of the recruits senselessly slain, she actually fights and kills or injures several of the attackers. Not in the show.
  • She's forced to subsist on insects and worms while she struggles to take charge(with Gendry) of a group of children who wounded(Lommy), stupid(Hot Pie) or too young (Weasel)to really do anything. (not in the show)
  • After being captures she sees Lommy Greenhands getting killed and witnesses several days worth of senseless torture and murder. (this happens in the show.)
  • The two year old Weasel is lost in the forest. (doesn't exist in the show.)
  • She witnesses horrible torture(unspecified and thus more horrific in the books.) This happens in the show.
  • On the march north she witnesses atrocities: nightly rapes, horrific brutality,, the casual murder of a three year old boy and his mother, the bisection of a woman who's been repeatedly gang-raped. (this doesn't happen in the show.)
AT this point becomes a sheep. The spunky, feisty Arya? Subsumed by fear. Spunky feisty show Arya never really goes away.

  • At Harrenhal, in the show, she gets a pretty cushy job as Lord Tywin's cupbearer. She banters with him and considers murdering him. Not in the books.
  • In the books, she's forced to scrub stairs  and is regularly beaten.
She becomes a mouse. Inobtrusive, invisible. And she hates it.

  • In  the show, she uses her last deathwish from Jaqen H'ghar to gain her escape.This is a marked departure from the book, where she uses her last wish to free some northern prisoners, and then later finds out, in a bitter twist of irony, that they were to be freed all along.
Thus, GRRM's genie-with-three-wishes fairy tale is completely changed.
  • In the books she manages her own escape, cutting the throat of a man to do it and swiping three horses for her herself, Gendry and Hot Pie. She doesn't need a man to help her escape in the books. This is a pretty big departure.
So at this point, she has witnessed far more horrors at the end of book two, and killed more people than she has at the end of season 2.

Her season 3 and four arc largely follows the same path as the book.
  • Only she's part of the Brothers without Banners for far, far longer than in the show; and she sees a number of horrible things due to the war that she misses in the show; including battles, people with eyes gouged out and ''manhoods" cut off languishing in tiny bird cages; she sees battles and hangings.

  • The Red Wedding is really the main traumatic event that pushes her over the edge in the show; in the books, it's just the latest and most crushing event in a long, long, long line of traumatic events.
  • She kills a Frey soldier after the Red Wedding in the show. Doesn't happen in the book--she's already killed a lot more in the show.

Overall, the end result is basically the same: the only thing is, I feel that Arya in the book has experienced much much more horror and trauma, more psychological twisting as her personality is constantly submerged and damaged; and she has more agency of her own in the books and needs less protection from men.
  • And she's a warg in the books. She enters her stray direwolf several times in the books,  when sleeping. In one notable scene she even, in wolf-form, kills the men hunting her after her escape from Harrenhal.This is a connection she has with her past, her true self, with Arya Stark,  thus explaining the fact that doesn't submit wholly to the brainwashing techniques used by the Faceless Men. Thus far in the show we've seen no sign of this.

ASOIAF short :Is Podrick Payne dead?



In the show, certainly not.

It's less certain in the books. But I'm inclined to say no.
SPOILERS from A Feast for Crows and A Dance with Dragons

IN the books, when last we see Pod he's being hanged by Lady Stoneheart's gang.
When Brienne chooses 'sword' she does it to save Pod from the Brothers Without Banners not to save herself. And I like to believe she succeeded.
So, when Brienne comes to fetch Jaime at Pennytree,.I reckon Pod is being held captive by Lady Stoneheart as insurance that Brienne'll come back with Jaime.
Prediction:
Next I think that she's going to have the choice of seeing Pod hanged again or fighting Jaime to the death.
Because that's just the kind of moral conundrum GRRM likes to give to his characters.

Friday, February 26, 2016

Why were Jeb Bush's chances so hopeless in this election

It's called peronality. Presidents have it.
Jeb Bush doesn't have it.
And lacking it, the mega-personality Donald Trump just blew him off the stage from the beginning.
Chris Christie blew him off the stage.
MARCO RUBIO blew him off the stage!
.
W had a certain Texan, ordinary guy charm with his cracking western accent, his ability to stick his foot in his mouth and just shrug it off, his cocksure swagger. He was a cowboy and he looked the part.
Not everyone liked, it. By the end of his second term almost everyone hated it. But he had personality. Good old boy.
Jeb, frankly, seemed like a fat rich boy with a Richie Rich haircut  trying to do everything right.
Good little boy.
.
.

About the Author

Will Khal Drogo Come Back?

elief is that 'khal drogo' will be resurrected in a metaphoric way, not a literal way.
It may have already happened: it may have simply been an oblique foretelling of Drogon(named after Drogo) rescuing Dany from the fighting pits in Meereen.
If anything, though, I think it is foretelling that Dany will conquer the Dothraki with Drogon, allowing her to lead, once again, a huge khalasar in addition to her other armies.
Some people go so far as to say that Drogo's spirit entered Drogon during the ritual that hatched the dragon.
That's interesting but I'm not sure if it could ever be verified.

Why did Victarion Greyjoy burn the ship with the sex slaves on board?


Why didnt he take them as salt wife or give them to his friends and family or why didnt he just take this valuable ship?




Victarion is  Ironborn. And he's the most Ironborn of the Ironborn. Strong. Bold. Brave. Cruel. Killer instincts. Fearless in battle. Doesnt care if he drowns or dies. Just really enjoys the pirate/viking lifestyle.
Like most Ironborn, he is a fervent believer in the Drowned God.
And, just to solidify his his standing as the iconic Ironborn captain...he's dumb as a box of rocks.
Which is why he basically shrugs off the wound he receives in battle when taking the Shield Islands. He's just too tough to accept treatment. Only a fleshwound!
So, when his wound festers and the Maester proves unable to heal it and fears that Victarion turns to the strange sorcerer Moquorro, who, miraculously, they have found clinging to a bit of mast from the storm-wrecked Salaesori Qhoran.
Moqorro is a priest of the Red God, the Lord of Light. R'hllor.
Moqorro tells Victarion that he's foreseen that if he doesn't let Moqorro heal his wound he will die of the infection.
And so he heals it.
After the healing, realizing that the Red Priest has saved his life he gains a healthy respect for the Lord of Light.
He still believes in the Drowned God. That's his culture.
But he figures it's better to have two gods on his side than just one.
And so he sacrifices the sex slaves, (which is totally painful for him because those sex slaves are hot) by setting the fishing ketch afire. They'll burn and they'll drown.
He sacrifices to both gods.

Wednesday, February 24, 2016

What are some reasons NOT to move to Europe?


Note: this is from an American in Europe's perspective and it was inspired by a question asked by another American.

There are plenty of reasons not to move, but if you've got the urgeDO IT ANYWAY.




Vodka Martina, straight, no vermouth, olive juice, shaken with ice. Ten ounces of alcohol.
I remember sitting at a bar, drunk on vodka martinis telling my friend Andrew(now dead of brain cancer, found out on Facebook last year) how I was going to get out, how I was going to leave and never come back to 'this wretched, wretched country' again.
It was all I could think of. For weeks. I worked like a man obsessed as I hunted for a job online and gathered together the many documents I needed for the move to Europe, working overtime and saving money to cushion my impact when I made landfall.
I dreamed of a life of cafes and intellectuals , art galleries and dramatic romance, all set against of backdrop of ancient, ornate architecture; I dreamed I'd write the next Tropic of Cancer.
. I talked breathlessly of my dreams to my friend Alice--(so close to me at the time. Haven't talked to her since).
My friends supported me, got sick of hearing it. (never saw them again, anyway.)
I'd always dreamed of Europe.
I talked to my friend Daniel, who ended up moving to Berlin at about the same time. He lives five hours away from me. Haven't seen him since. Our mutual friend Phillip, a man who I'd had such stimulating conversations about art and sex and life came out in 2011 to Berlin to direct his first film film. , I heard about that. But we never could meet up. Right after wrapping, Philip had a heart attack and died back in Denver at the age of 43.

First things first, though.
LIfe is not that much better in Europe, unless you're very poor, perhaps.
Though if you're truly poor, life is going to suck wherever you are. But at least going to the doctor will feel less stressful in Europe.
Europeans online are probably going to tell you that life in Europe is just peachy keen, leading you to think that it's all a soapy utopia. American leftists tend to feel the same. I should know. I am an American leftist.
It's true that they have some very fine systems in place in the EU, better than we have in the US.
But not everything in the world comes down to money and systems and so on. There are emotions and people and relationships you should consider.
Because take it from me. Life is life.
Life is what you make it.
I realize this is not profound, it's not original. Henry Miller I obviously am not.
That doesn't make it untrue.
If you're unhappy in America, you might be unhappy in Europe too. Happiness is not related to where you live.
That's just a bunch of nationalist (or super-nationalist, if we're talking EU) bunk. Treat it like the cow-patty it is. Anytime someone tries to sell you a vision that seems too good to be true, guess what. It is too good to be true.
Trust me.
I'ts not all this:

An awfu lot is more like this:
Reasons for not living in Europe
They are personal, not political.
Forget politics. You'll likely never vote in Europe anyway.
Reasons might include:
  • First and foremost your family.
    • You'll hardly ever see them.
    • Your siblings' children will grow up without you in their life;
    • your family will love you but forget about you;
    • and the next thing you know, you will be called back home because one of your parents is dying and you'll wonder where all the time went.
    • You will feel totally cut off from the people you know and they won't relate to your issues or vice versa.
  • You won't be able to relate as much to a lot of the people around you because they have a different cultural background:
    • they'll have in jokes you won't get;
    • quote movies you've never seen; and when you see them, they won't mean as much to you.
  • You won't be able to get certain dishes or food products you crave.
    • Ok, this is a small thing, for me. I can't get what I call good Mexican food here in Europe(which is really TEX-MEX, of course); but I can get other food. Still, you crave it and other foods.
    • And when you mention your craving a lot of people will turn their nose up at you; they'll take it personally.
    • It's little things like this that will make some people say: Then go back to America!!
  • You will like an outsider because of your birthplace.
    • This is something most people might feel sometimes. After awhile it goes away--you develop a thicker skin. But it can be something you feel acutely at first.
  • You will hear constant criticism of the US. .
    •  Don't get me wrong. You'll hear nice things too. But the problem is:
  • You will hear your friends, family, et al reduced to dehumanizing stereotypes
    • It'll happen, unless you just shy away from conversations with any kind of depth. And sometimes you might not be in the mood for it. Eventually you get over this, too, though.
  • You will lack for a safety net of family and friends.
    • You lose your job; you get pickpocketed on the way to the bank; you blow all your money doing something stupid...and it's a lot harder for anybody to bail you out. Start thinking ahead and really responsibly NOW. Because if you get in trouble, you don't want to run home with your tail between your legs. How embarrassing! The guy who shook off his home country only to come crawling back like the Prodigal Son. No thank you.
  • When you go back home, you will realize that living abroad has changed you to the point where you won't be able to relate to your countrymen.
    • Because you'll always be comparing this and that to here and there--and they won't relate to that.
    • Because you won't know who the hell Miley Cyrus is or why the hell everybody is talking about her.
    • Because the social rules of conversation will be different and you will adapt to them; and then you will be perceived as rude/politically incorrect/insensitive or whatever.
  • some people will radically change their personalities and beliefs to please the people around them, to fit in; others will develop a ridiculous idealization of their home country(in your case, the USA) that doesn't match up with reality.
    • Either way, it's pathetic.
  • Bureaucracy is a mother.
    • There's not getting around it. You will have to deal with it. And you will rage about it. But it won't go away. It'll cost you money and time. Because you don't just 'move' to Europe. Not if you're smart. News flash: most Europeans don't WANT immigrants. There are Donald Trumps in every country; the rest of the world doesn't know about them, though. It's not impossible but it's a pain.
  • Unless you move there really fluent in the language, you are going to face some serious, serious loneliness.
    • I spent a whole summer, sitting by the river in my town, doing nothing all day but throwing pieces of bread of the old medieval bridge of the town I lived in  to the trout which amassed underneath. I didn't have any money that summer, so that was my entertainment. Pre-e-book era too. Lonliness will lead to soul searching. It can strengthen you; it can make you a man; but it can also drive people crazy. I have definitely met some really cuckoo expats in my time. Like, a LOT of them. Maybe up to 50%.
Now, those are some reasons not to move.

IF YOU HAVE THE URGE, DO IT ANYWAY
Having said all that, I absolutely think that if you're curious you should try it, if you are young and childless.
And I want to repeat that last bit: if you are childless.
Don't move abroad with a kid, unless it's for a job that pays a LOT of money so that you can afford to put them in a good international school.
Still, if you are childless and especially if you are young, GO FOR IT.
Do it smartly--research where you want to go; get a job there ahead of time if possible.
Give yourself some time there, too. Six months givs you a taste of a country: try two years. Live two years in Europe and see how you like it. Don't accept mommy and daddy's money. Unless they are really well off. In which case, milk 'em for all their worth!
Your ancestors, white or black or Asian, crossed the Atlantic(or the Pacific) in a 60 foot boat in conditions we'd call appalling today. If they could do that, you can stick it out and make it in modern Europe on  your own.
In that  two years, you'll go through good times and bad times, but after two years you will have settled down enough in a routine.
You will know yourself.
You will understand the country you've moved to.
You will see your own country in a completely different light.
You will see good points and bad points about where you are.
In the cocoon of not understanding what is going on around you, you will be forced to observe human nature.
You will gain the wisdom of being someone who is not a member of ANY nation.
But life will still be lifeAnd when you really realize that life is still life and you are there where you are, wherever you are and all those other coffee mug clichés, then you make a permanent choice. To go home or to stay away.
Because the longer you stay away, the harder it's going to be to get back into the labor market back home. And that's going to matter more and more as you get older.  The longer you stay, the longer you will HAVE to stay.
Most Americans choose to go back home.

But it's an experience, no matter what.. And whether you decide to go home in the end, or stay, you'll be glad you had the experience.  I think anybody in the USA who can should move abroad: to Europe, to Asia, to Mexico, South America, wherever. Experience life! See what it's like. Learn another language.
And you might forever regret it if you don't.

Now, I'm sitting in my kitchen in my comfortable house in my small town in the country drinking...tap water. I don't go to cafés that often. I haven't written the next 'Farewell to Arms'.  I mostly eat regular food I cook myself at home with my family.
I work about  50 hours a week because I'm a business owner and that means you work more, no matter where you are.
I'm a 45 year old man with heart disease, but I walk 7 kms every day for my health and I have 6 weeks of vacation time a year. I have a comfortable salary and I don't have to worry about stuff like deductibles and co-pays and all those other American insurance terms which I don't even honestly know the meaning of.
I have a beautiful and smart son who speaks two langauges and will soon start learning a third..
I get books in English on my Kindle(greatest invention EVER) and I can communicate in English online whenever I want.
My life is pretty good. But it's not perfect. No place is. YOu might be happy here. YOu might be happy in sub-saharan Africa. Who knows?
I fight with my girlfriend sometimes, and I have health problems; I feel major stress at work sometimes, just like you do in the states.
People who tell you life is so much better here are just vile natonalists...
But it was a good move overall  for me. Even if that guy at the top is totally gone. But my family is here and so is my life.

ASOIAF, short: Who is the kindest character in Game of Thrones?


People make a lot about the darkness of A Song of Ice and Fire.
And yet, I think this is a misconception. It's dark because it's depicting a war. Wars are not happy cheery things.War is a sort of sickness on human society when all things go haywire and bad becomes good and vice versa. It's important to remember that in Westeros, as in our world, there is goodness, acts of kindness, honor and real, unselfish love..So I'm going to list characters for whom I think kindness is a dominant trait.
Samwell: goes out of his way to rescue Gilly from her father and her bastard son from the Others; essentially looks out for Gilly; sells belongings in an attempt to help the ailing Maester Aemon. Is uncomfortable with the hunting of animals; feels bad for the crows in their cages.
Jon Snow: Jon Snow is tough when he has to be; and he has other motivations than kindness often enough;  but he definitely has a kind heart; gives Arya a sword to remember her by, thus showing his insight into her heart; comes to respect and understand a foreign culture enough that he's willing to take the risk of letting them come into his own country as refugees, despite ferocious opposition from his senior officers.
Meera: provides food and protection for the crippled Bran Stark; manages to consistently cheer him up and treat him as a person despite being from a very able-ist society;
Maester Luwin: truly cares for the STark children and serves them until death
Hodor: simply lacks a cruel bone in his ample body. If there was one character who exemplified kindness it'd probably be him.
Yoren: Yoren of the Night's Watch heroically gives his life standing up (with some condemned thieves and criminals) for some hapless orphan children as well as Gendry WAters and Arya Stark, allowing them all to escape(though ultimately, only three will survive.)
I originally had Sansa Stark on this t; I think she commits commit acts of kindness; notably her manipulation of Joffrey to save Dontos and her ability to quell Sweetrobin's shaking sickness; but I think her character is a little too complex to say that kindness is her  dominant trait. Tyrion, too, commits some real kindnesses; but also pulls off some decidedly unkind acts.

ASOIAF short:What did Oberyn Martell mean when he said to Tyrion "I would sooner the scorpions fell on me than the queen in all her naked beauty"?


note: I've written so many of these that I'm going to start doing 2 every other day--a long one, and a short one. I know not everyone has time to read the long ones, which are usually the most interesting. But I've literally written hundreds of these and I need to try to clear my cache a little.

What did Oberyn Martell mean when he said to Tyrion "I would sooner the scorpions fell on me than the queen in all her naked beauty"?

He is referencing the fate of Lyonel Tyrell, the Lord of Highgarden who successfully raided Dorne during the Rain of Daeron I.
Daeron appointed him governor of Dorne, where he spent a lot of time trying to subdue him.
The Dornish are pretty much impossible to subdue though.
One of his habits he had was, after he had taken a castle, he would kick the local lord out and take his bedroom for his own while he stayed.
He had a weakness for wenches and one of these beds had a long sash with which he could summon a wench to his bed.
One day he pulled on the sash to summon a wench and instead of a bell ringing(or whatever) the canopy of hte bed collapsed upon him, filled with poisonous scorpions, which killed him.
Earlier in the conversation with Tyrion, Oberyn had hinted that Cersei had attempted to use her womanly wiles on him; he had already professed a fantasy that he and his lover Ellaria Sand were looking to have a threesome with a beautiful blonde woman.
Here he is reassuring Tyrion that he is not going to do what she wants. I take it to mean that he is repulsed by the idea of sleeping with Cersei, knowing what she is(and even what had been as a child). He'd literally rather die.

Tuesday, February 23, 2016

What was the best lesson that a teacher ever taught you?

I'm terrible at art.
 I mean, awful. 
I can draw, like, a snake and stick figures. and a house with curling smoke coming out of the chimney and a little piece of sun in the upper right-hand corner.
I've always been terrible at art.
It's an awful disappointment, because I really like art. I have had dreams of abstract sculptures and paintings that were the coolest things I've ever seen. I always wake up disappointed, knowing that I could never ever make these pictures of art that my mind makes up in my sleep.
When I was a kid, consequently, I hated art class. My visual art talent is so terrible, that it felt like I was a retard. Other kids used to laugh at my ineptitude. Or maybe they didn't, but i was so bad that I was sure they did. It was more like they gave me pitying looks.
One time in my art class in 4th grade, we were supposed to draw or paint using INK. Not watercolors or oil paint, or chalk or crayon or colored pencil, but ink. They came in these little brown glass bottles.
I sat for a long time not knowing what to do, then I had an idea. I went for a blue bottle but accidentally spilt it on the little piece of posterboard that I had to draw on. I got really upset. I started yelling "I can't do it I can't do it I can't do it! I hate art!" I was really, really upset. Like, heart beating fast, hyperventilating upset.

I felt that art class and my inability to create anything pleasing was something that was strangling me--I literally was having difficulty breathing.
My teacher, no idea what her name was, but she will always stick in my mind, came to me and started trying to calm me down.
I told her how impossible it was for me to do this. That I was terrible. I apologized for ruining my picture. I hadn't done it on purpose. I didn't mean to make it a mess.
She looked at it, at the blotch on the paper. "What's wrong with it?" she asked.
 I said, "Well, look at it, I spilt ink on it."
"So?"
"So, it's ruined."
She said, "Hold it up to your face and blow on  it."
"What?"
"Just hold it up to your face and blow on the ink. As hard as you can."
She showed me how to hold the bit of board: horizontal, level to my face.
I blew the round blue ink blotch and it sent off tendrils. I held it at another angle and blew and the tendrils went the other way. It looked very different.
She let me make blotches with the other bottles of ink, so I had many colors of ink that I blew on to make these weird shapes. All of them looked like cool splotches of many colors. It was a total revelation: that she had taken my mistake and told me, completely untalented, awkward me, how to make something beautiful and cool with it...and it worked!
.When I was done, she said, "OK, now draw something little on it."
"What should I draw?"
"What do you want to draw?"
I paused. I didn't know. And then it came to me.
"A Ladybug."
So I drew a tiny little ladybug crawling on these sort of abstract blown splotches of ink.

When I was done, the teacher said: "I call that a masterpiece."
And it was. It was very cool looking. I couldn't believe it. It was much better than what it would have originally been if I hadn't spilt the ink.
 The teacher entered it in a city-wide contest.
Sadly, I moved away shortly after that and I never got the piece of art back. Or I'd show you a picture of it. You'll just have to imagine it.
But that lesson really stuck with me. And it was one of the most useful lessons I've ever learnt.

ASOIAF: Is Tywin the best character in A Song of Ice and Fire?

What do it mean,  'best character'? The best written, the strongest, the most bad-ass?
But I'll tell you what I think about  Tywin.
I. Hate. Tywin.
Most people defend Tywin because of his perceived competence, his ability to make the hard decisions that advance the cause of, his house and the Lannister legacy.
It's a crock.
Particularly the last two. He advances nothing but his own reputation, which is what you'd expect from a vain, vile narcissist like him.

Now, I'm not going to argue that Tywin wasn't smart and and that he didn't have a good knowledge of how the gears of power worked.
There's no disputing that he ruled the SEven Kingdoms as Aerys' Hand effectively and competently. And that he is one of the great players of the Game of Thrones. He is worthy of some respect.

Sharp Lessons
But it's the over the top reaction to what he feels are slights that gets me. That sickens me.
And yes, I know his father was a nincompoop, a weak-willed pushover who almost brought ruin onto House Lannister. Boo-hoo. Widdle Tywin didn't like being laughed at. Fair enough.
But there's a deft approach to such problems as Tytos Lannister encouraged; and there's the nuclear approach.
Tywin always goes nuclear.

First of all there's the way he dealt with the uppity lords who had defied his weak, ineffectual father, the Tarbecks and the Reynes.
There's no doubt they had some punishment coming. But he didn't just punish them. He wiped them out. Every man and child of them.
RAther than go through with a siege he simply demolished the Tarbeck's crumbling castle while the survivors, including Lady Tarbeck and her son, Tion the Red in it.
"Men say Tywin never smiled....When Tarbeck Hall came crashing down on Lady Ellyn...he smiled then.
--A Feast for Crows
Hilarious.
And let's look at the fate of the Reynes:
First of all, the Reyne's castle, Castamere was considered close to impregnable. Most of it was underground, in the gold mines that had made their house rich.
When the Reynes retreated to it's safest, he simply blocked all the exits and diverted a nearby stream into the castle.
[There were] more than three hundred men, women and children [in the] mines. Not one ever emerged. A few of the guards assigne to the smallest and most distant of the nine entrances reported hearing faint screams and shouts coming from beneath the earth one night but by daybreak the stones had gone silent once again.
Yeah. He made his reputation.
Was it necessary to teach them a lesson? Yes. Was it necessary to kill every single one of them and their servants to boot?
No. No it wasn't.

And then there's the matter of Tywin's father's mistress. The insult was that she was a commoner, the daughter of a candlestick maker. And after Tywin's mother died in childbirth, she became Tytos' mistress.
The horror. The daughter of a candlestick maker.
So what did Tywin do? What he always did. He went nuclear.
When Lord Tywin's father died he returned to Casterly Rock to find a...woman...bedecked in his lady mother's jewels, wearing one of her gowns. He stripped them off her and all else as well. For a fortnight she was paraded naked through the streets of Lannisport, to confess to every man she met that she was a thief and a harlot. That was how Lord Tywin Lannister dealt with whores.
--A Feast for Crows.
Bastard.

Legacy:
But it's all for his legacy, isn't it? It's necessary for him to do hard things to seal Lannister's reputation, wasn't it? He did it for the children!
No one messes with the Lannisters!
True.
You know who else generally never gets messed with? The Starks in the North. Well, up until recently.
Now, Ned Stark deals with things.
He was ready to chop off Jorah Mormont's head for  selling his criminals into slavery.
But he wasn't ready to extinguish the Mormont family.

Oh and reemember the Martells? The story about how Oberyn Martell was offered as a potential bride to Cersei? And Tywin said no, Cersei's meant for Prince Rhaegar.
And then Elia married Rhaegar instead.
It took a few years.
But when he had the opportunity Tywin got his own back. And typically he went nuclear.
He had Elia's daughter murdered, literally dragged out from under her bed where she was hiding and 'stabbed half a hundred times'.
And he had AEgon, a mere infant, dashed against a wall. His reduced to 'a red ruin.'
And his murderer, Gregor Clegane raped Elia with the brains of Aegon still on his hands.
Sharp lessons, indeed.
And yes, he did order it. Maybe he regretted the gruesomeness of it all; the rape and murder of Elia he might not have planned. But he wanted those kids dead.

Tywin's legacy
And let's take a look at his legacy.

He's got a son whose big mouth got his main claim to fame, his sword-hand, chopped off and who despises himself so much he wants nothing to do with the legacy his father wants so badly with him.
Oh, and he's universally despised as the Kingslayer all over Westeros.
A daughter who's disrespected and hated by most of the realm and whose terrible decisions, driven by her paranoia, narcissm and her wish to do things like her father would do has pretty much pissed away any chance of the Lannister's retaining their hold on power in WEsteros.
Oh and some grandkids who are the sons of incest from his narcissistic twins' love affair.
If Tywin's line is still standing by the end of this series, I'll be surprised.

The rape of Tyrion
And then there's Tyrion.
What did Tyrion do? He was born a dwarf. And Tywin's wife died giving him life.
This shames Tywin. The gods have cursed Tyrion to 'teach [Tywin] humility' he declares.
Boo-frickin'-hoo.
So he gives him every shitty job he can.
He makes him chief plumber of Casterly Rock.
Appoints him as deputy Hand so he can deal with an almost impossible political situation in King's Landing, than refuses to give him any credit or honor.
He appoints him as Master of Coin, an office Littlefinger has made impossible to manage through his own Ponzi schemes and cooked books.
He forbids him from having sex with anybody! and disinherits him.
And then after presiding over a JOKE of a trial, he plans to have him executed.
And yes, I know he tells Tyrion that he plans to send him to the Wall. The fact is, everyone else(Jaime and Cersei) reflect that Tyrion is set to be put to death the day after he ended up escaping.
I doubt that Tyrion was ever going to be sent to the Wall.
He was going to kill his own disabled son.
I guess that would have put the inheritance question to rest. Take that, gods.

I'm not even going to get into his vile insistence that Tyrion rape Sansa Stark, a woman already humiliated a hundred times over who's been through more Tywin-inflicted trauma than almost anyone; his cynical disregard for the honor of the King's Guard(though maybe Cersei is responsible for the corruption of that office); his shitting all over the tradition of sending criminals to the Night's Watch;  or his vile treatment of innocent peasants during the War, the inflicting of Tywin's Dogs(Clegane, Lorch, the Bloody Mummers) on the Riverlands, the utterly senseless destruction and death, the coming starvation that he's directly responsble for dealt out to thousands.
Reread those Arya chapters. He's torturing people to death for no reason. Toddlers getting their faces smashed in. Mothers raped and murdered. Fields burnt. Cows killed.

The Greatest Crime o all--I believe that children are the future
And lest it be forgotten, he took Tyrion's first wife and
  • had her gang raped by an entire garrison(50 soldiers? 100 soldiers) forcing Tyrion to watch then
  • forced Tyrion to take part in the rape
  • forced Jaime to betray his brother with this crime
Tyrion raped Tysha.
And Tywin raped Tyrion, twisting him forever into a being who believes that no one can love him unless he pays them.

And then, in a stunning achievement in hypocrisy, he had sex with Shae.
And now Tyrion is a refugee in Essos, gnashing his teeth, blown to emotional bits, plotting revenge, death and ruin for House Lannister and Westeros itself.
Some legacy, Tywin. 
No seriously. Fuck that guy.
There's only one death in this whole series that has satisfied me.
When Tywin shat his life away on the privy with his son's crossbolt lodged in his bowels...I cheered.